This is well the same reason for the talks of an East African Federation, and turning the Alliance of Sahel States into a single sovereign state as well, right? What are the benefits or potential drawbacks of actually unifying different countries into a single state, as opposed to forming closely-integrated alliances?
What makes this ideal as opposed to the four constituent states being separate?
Larger countries have more influence at an international stage.
This is why the Arabs originally petitioned for a unified, independent state after WWII - but were betrayed by the British.
This is well the same reason for the talks of an East African Federation, and turning the Alliance of Sahel States into a single sovereign state as well, right? What are the benefits or potential drawbacks of actually unifying different countries into a single state, as opposed to forming closely-integrated alliances?
1.breaks sykes pecot borders
2.hopefully kills king Abdullah II the tomato salesman
Alright I’m on board