Couple months ago I met a woman who works at a dispensary I visit about once a week. We hit it off really well. Despite trying to just keep it casual sex, and that only, I ended up developing some feelings for her. She confessed the same to me. I even introduced her to my teenaged daughter, for fucks sake.

I ran into her this evening at a gas station, with another guy, who turns out to be her husband. They’ve been married five years, and have two children together, ages 4 and 2. Finding out they have kids just made me feel disgusting.

So, I told him. He didnt believe me until I described a tattoo in a somewhat intimate place on her body. I had no fucking clue she was married. I think I ruined someone’s marriage. Or at least took part in ruining one.

I feel guilty. I am sorry for what I participated in. Am I a bad person?

  • Nocturne Dragonite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You didn’t do anything wrong and people here trying to scold you for that is bullshit. I’ve been cheated on before, more than once and it feels like shit. You have trust issues for years and it craters your self esteem.

    There are no reasons to cheat on someone. And she has kids? C’mon now. I’m not trying to hear any excuses. If she had disclosed all of that and everyone was informed then it wouldn’t have been a problem but obviously you didn’t know, and blaming you for things you couldn’t possibly know is also bullshit.

  • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    the chorus of he/hims in this thread positively relishing the idea of this woman getting punished by her husband for her actions and not even stopping to think about the possible violent repercussions of OPs actions is honestly disturbing. people cheat for all variety of reasons. many of them, especially for women, are justified. hate when this site shows its reddit logo roots so plainly.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      not even stopping to think about the possible violent repercussions of OPs actions

      I did think about it, but the bottom line is that if your safety relies on someone else keeping a secret for you, you need to let them in on the secret. If I’m seeing someone and they tell me that they have an abusive partner and that they’re technically cheating but that they’re only still in the relationship because they don’t know a way to get out of it, obviously I’m not saying anything to the partner (even given the possibility that it isn’t true)

      But you can’t expect someone to cover for your lie when you’ve been lying to them

      • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        so she deserves whatever’s coming to her basically because of that moral infraction/strategic error? real nice. top male minds of hexbear showing their whole fucking asses in this thread. you’re fucking gross.

        • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          so she deserves whatever’s coming to her

          I did not say that. What I mean is that I find it extremely unlikely that someone who fears for her safety would keep this situation from the person whose actions are required to prevent her from being put in danger. I said that if you need someone to cover for your lie, you have to let them in on your lie. The implied logic being, therefore, if she didn’t, then she probably wasn’t that concerned about what would happen if OP did not cover for her lie. The consequences are probably a (rightfully) ruined relationship, not violence.

    • PauliExcluded [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Hot take, but there is no justification for cheating. You should just end the relationship or discuss the possibility of having an open relationship instead.

      • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        no justification? what about circumstances of abuse? cishet relationships are an uneven power dynamic. plenty of women out there with varying degrees of asshole husbands who they feel coerced into staying with for economic reasons or because of fear. that is how the dynamic manifests in many cases. you come across ignorant and thoughtless acting like ending a relationship is always such a simple act. this is Christian morality nonsense, non-dialectical thinking and basically doing a generalised form of victim blaming tbh. “just leave him” smh. expect a more thought out response from a woman.

        • PauliExcluded [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No, it’s not Christian morality. This is the basics of ethical non-monogamy. Every person involved is aware and consents.

          If you fear your partner will be violent towards you, you need to leave. Period. Cheating will not make the problem better. People who are violent will not accept being cheated on without violence. Your number one priority should be getting yourself to a safe place away from the abuser.

          And no, I’m not ignorant about this. My parents got a divorced because of an affair. I’ve had multiple partners cheat on me before. I’ve been in an ethical non-monogamous relationship before. I’ve been in a monogamous relationship where I gave my consent that my partner could have sex with someone else. If you withhold information from someone that might make them not consent, they cannot provide informed consent. Cheating is not justified.

    • Rojo27 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Honestly hadn’t thought of it like that. And after reading some more of details OP provided in the replies, especially the fact that she was making a big deal about him approaching, makes it seem like there was some legitimate fear on her part of some sort of reprecussion.

      I just hope others take your, and other women’s, perspective on this and learn something. Admittedly I figure being honest about an affair with the person that is being cheated on seems like a good thing on the surface, but it also completely devalues the woman and the situation they may have been in prior to cheating.

  • xiaohongshu [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Unsolicited relationship take: maybe it’s worth finding out her marriage situation first (e.g. abusive husband) before pulling the trigger? Maybe she already has plans to leave him, but couldn’t tell you in advance for certain reasons? The reasons could be a lot more complicated than your assumptions here.

    Now if it indeed turns out to be an abusive husband, I fear for the woman’s life.

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    21 hours ago

    As someone else mentioned, it probably would have been worth giving her an opportunity to give her perspective before deciding if and how to tell the husband. Most likely the final result is just telling him, but there are more marginal possibilities that it is worth accounting for and taking an extra couple of days wouldn’t have harmed you or him (yours was already a dead relationship by virtue of your understandable disapproval of her cheating, so it’s not like you’d be enabling her to cheat for longer unless you think she’s managing to juggle even more guys along with young children and a marriage).

    • SchillMenaker [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      She had every opportunity to be honest from the outset of their relationship. Getting caught lying isn’t some magic reset where now you get to tell your side.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Talking about this in terms of social contract theory is really sidestepping the morality of the issue. Would you say that her lying entitles OP to punch her in the face? Surely not, two wrongs don’t make a right, punitive justice is bad, etc. What OP should do is investigate the issue with her not because she “gets to” tell her side or has a right to, but because he doesn’t know what the consequences of telling the husband would be. For all he knows, the husband is abusive and would beat her for this transgression, transgression though it is. The most likely outcome is, of course, that the husband is not abusive, but the most likely outcome of a round of Russian roulette is that you go unharmed. In either case, there is a real risk that is severe enough that it’s worth checking, even if it’s substantially less likely.

        • SchillMenaker [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Actually, within your framework, the morally correct thing to do is make sure she didn’t notice you seeing her, quietly break it off, and do absolutely nothing else beyond that. You can’t possibly know for certain the outcomes of your actions no matter how much “investigation” you do, so the possibility of causing a negative outcome exists if you attempt to influence the situation in any way.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That only makes sense if you completely discount the husband as a moral patient. While I’m arguing that he’s been slightly over-emphasized, I am by no means discounting him and in most possible scenarios believe he should be informed. If he has no history known to his wife of probably 4+ years of being an abuser to her or others as far as she knows, it’s pretty unlikely that he is. Making the decision to not tell him anyway on the very, very unlikely chance that he, as a historically normal dude, snaps and blows her head off with a shotgun, is completely discounting the guaranteed outcome of him being wronged by being left in the dark about this.

        • SchillMenaker [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          There was a non-trivial chance that OP could get battered or straight up murdered without any knowledge or consent able to be given if the husband were to ever find out. The other party took zero of the steps available to mitigate this possibility.

          There’s a non-trivial chance that this behavior puts their children in danger because the offending party is making risky decisions to cover up their indiscretion. It’s impossible to know.

          Maybe the “investigation” removed the woman into doing something unconscionable.

          In any number of imaginary situations, the OP took the morally correct approach and your approach could have gotten someone hurt or killed by inaction. It’s an incredibly morally ambiguous position to be put in and this guy did what he felt was right, it’s hard for me to pass that kind of judgement on him.

          • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            blaming the woman for the theoretical actions of her theoretically murderous husband, nice. not engaging with this misogynistic nonsense. tbh women in cishet relationships cheating is basically nbd anyway, couldn’t care less.

            • Adlach
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 hours ago

              women in cishet relationships cheating is basically nbd anyway

              C’mon.

              • SadArtemis [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Stalin definitely fucked though stalin-heart

                Also, no offense but please, touch grass and consider the human element of things. Cheating generally sucks but there’s a whole world of circumstances out there (many of which are far more common than you’d like to know) which would excuse or even justify it in varying degrees, and even if we’re to assume uncharitable things, they’re still human beings (who have messed up in doing very human things).

                • SchillMenaker [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  That’s why he stopped at Berlin.

                  Also, no offense taken. I live an extremely grass-filled life, I just can’t handle inconsistency. I understand that circumstances may justify unfaithfulness to a spouse, but completely lying about it to the guy who made the post means you’re just a piece of shit. That clearly hits a raw nerve with a lot of people but it’s not really a gray area.

    • Feinsteins_Ghost [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That conversation ranks up there with one of the more difficult ones I’ve ever had to approach a stranger for. Had she not made such a big deal about me not talking to him when I was first approaching, it probably wouldn’t have gotten his attention and I might not have followed thru with it.

    • ComradeMonotreme [she/her, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      My friends call me a loser

      'Cause I’m still hanging around

      I’ve heard so many rumors

      That I’m just a girl that you bang on your couch

      I thought you thought of me better

      Someone you couldn’t lose

      You said, “We’re not together”

      So now when we kiss, I have anger issues

  • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    23 hours ago

    You did what you should have done in your situation by telling the husband when you found out.

    Just be glad you dodged a massive bullet now vs a few years down the line.

    • Feinsteins_Ghost [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah. I’m fine. It ended before I really got attached, or heaven forbid my daughter get attached.

      Shitty but I’ll be back to normal, whatever that is, in a couple days.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      christian moralism is when you think people shouldn’t be unknowingly stuck in a relationship with someone who has no respect for them

        • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago
          1. i know it’s not my relationship, i wasn’t involved. i am an internet person who has never met any of the relevant people commenting from a third party neutral perspective.

          2. when someone is being deeply wronged and they don’t know about it but you do, you are (in my opinion) morally obligated to inform them. and this is a very common point of view. it is extraordinarily normal for a person who is being cheated with to find out that the person they’ve been in a relationship with already has a partner and to then seek out that partner and inform them. it is standard practice. 99% of people agree that it is the correct course of action.

          cheating sucks. don’t cheat and you won’t have to worry about your partner being informed of your cheating

    • lil_tank [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If you know your partner cheats on you you can start moving on and enjoy new relationships. Life is short, dating is increasingly hard as you grow up, so wasting time in an exclusive relationship being cheated on is horrible when you know you could’ve experienced love with other people if you simply knew

      • LigOleTiberal [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        you could’ve also been cheating that entire time too. donny blame someone else’s actions for your own decisions in life. you are responsible for yourself and your decisions when it comes to inter-personal relationships, full stop.

        • Omegamint [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          17 hours ago

          You seem to have issues with the “ethical” part of non-monagamy. Cheating on your partner (aka, sleeping with other people without their consent), is not ethical. The ethical thing to do is to ask for that consent, and to break it off if you cant get it and you need to be with/sleep with other people.

          Something tells me I shouldn’t need to explain this

        • lil_tank [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          jesse-wtf

          Edit : Okay I get it youre against the monogamous patriarchal structure of marriage. I’m too actually, but as long as you get into a relationship with a partner that promises exclusivity it’s absolutely unfair to live a better life and prevent them to do so too. That’s the actual problem, instead of opening the relationship honestly and both live a better life outside the bonds of marriage you keep the other unable to do so and that’s wrong.

    • RomCom1989 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      While there is potentially more nuance to this, and maybe it could have been handled with a smidge more tact,I don’t see why a betrayal of trust like cheating shouldn’t be reported to the people affected by it only because there is a power imbalance in patriarchal society Obviously,you should make sure the person you’re outing wouldn’t be put in danger by this first,but it’s definitely not something to be excused

      • SadArtemis [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Obviously,you should make sure the person you’re outing wouldn’t be put in danger by this first,but it’s definitely not something to be excused

        I mean, if someone were to be put in danger by being exposed- wouldn’t that be a pretty damn good excuse?

        • LigOleTiberal [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          there’s any number of reasons people “cheat” and main one is that the very idea of monogamy and cheating stands from patriarchal monotheism and the fact that through ask of human history large numbers of adults have “cheated” or lived in non-monogamous societies shows that the idea that it is “BAD” to cheat it moralistic and idiotic.

          • Adlach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Pretty sure my wife would be mad at me if I cheated on her. Is she an agent of the patriarchy?

          • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Non ethical non monogamy is no different from patriarchal monogamy. Get outta here with your bad takes that because toxic monogamy exists it’s okay to be a lying sack of shit to your partners. Non monogamy is great but it has to be done ethically and consensually or it’s just a different style of bad

          • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Monogamy long predates patriarchal monotheism. Jews didn’t invent marriage. And while there have always been cultures without strict monogamy, there have also always been cultures with strict monogamy - and often these can exist in the same culture. How that makes the voluntary choice to be monogamous universally bad and therefore cheating is universally good I don’t know.

          • RomCom1989 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I agree,but under the current monogamous paradigm, people are going to feel hurt and betrayed by this sort of behavior

            So,even considering this,it would have been reasonable to expect that she would have told him beforehand

            Until a more enlightened age arrives,where more types of human connection other than monogamy will be commonplace, we can assume most people will have been socially conditioned to expect an exclusive arrangement and may not wish to take part in less conventional types of relationships and then act accordingly

  • GaveUp [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Do feel bad, you’re a good person for telling him

    Also maybe this is cause I’m a woman but also happy you’re safe. I’d be so afraid of the guy getting mad at me and getting physical

    • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’d be so afraid of the guy getting mad at me and getting physical

      thankfully that burden will now be borne entirely by his wife.

      …kinda shocked a woman doesn’t see how bad this is

      • GaveUp [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I had assumed that if he didn’t get mad enough to beat her right there and then after hearing the news he wouldn’t get any more mad and beat her later

        Now that I actually think about it yea, this is a completely wrong assumption

        I don’t know how cheaters and physical abusers think lol

        • SadArtemis [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Many totally messed up/dysfunctional people know how to keep a good face on for the public, and/or even have a particular preoccupation with doing so. My family, growing up as a kid, definitely was one such example- and eventually facades tend to break, but it can take years. Hopefully this isn’t one such case, but you never know.

  • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I mean she didn’t tell you, I’m not sure what you could have done short of waiting longer to have sex on the off chance you might discover she was hiding something, or asking outright. Which is a pretty toxic way to approach relationships from my point of view.

  • Rojo27 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    No, you aren’t a bad person. Honestly I’d be taken aback a bit that even after meeting your daughter she wouldn’t have thought of her own kids and told you the truth right then and there.

  • AndJusticeForAll [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Yeah, that sucks ass. Hope you can move on and all that. She probably should have clued in to things when seeing your daughter at least.

    Gunna’ use this thread to block the most annoying posters on here. These types and the people who try to bait reactionary language, either during debates or under a faux-naive guise, are the worst.

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You could not have known and you did the right thing after finding. Sorry you had to go through that though