My dad uses Google Maps, and he mentioned that it seems to be getting worse. Like, giving him directions that are obviously worse than alternatives. Has anyone else here experienced this?

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Makes sense. Google has been replacing skilled engineers with tail-eating AI regurgitation engines, which are getting progressively worse as they eat their own shit.

    But I’ve been told those regurgitation engines are about to get really smart and replace all skilled labor.

    So maybe it’ll be fine.

    Or maybe, as we’ve already started to see, more and more useful stuff will only be available via the Internet wayback machine, until they kill it.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Google/Waze will volunteer users to take alternative routes to scout out ways around congestion. It can be a better route, but you are the guinea pig, so you can get the short end of the stick.

    There also is learned driving habits that may inform routing choices.

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s pretty interesting about the scout cars.Is there any sort of indication thats what they’re doing? I will say given Google’s track record I wouldn’t put it past them to intentionally route traffic near where their paid advertiser’s money comes from.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        No indication except for knowing the area and being sent a strange way that doesn’t make sense to you.

        The routing is ambivalent to advertising money. The driving data they sell informs where advertisers put money. Horse, then cart; not cart, then horse.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          So far… I can easily see some MBA wanting to add that “feature”. They have your driving history, they could easily route someone with Starbucks stops past more Starbucks for a fee.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Am from Malaysia and since the road and street is named using local language(bahasa malaysia), google now read out the full road name in terrible accent and pronunciation it took 3 or 4 times longer to finish an instruction readout, which in some case you will miss your turn. The instruction sometime couldn’t even fit on the UI because the road name is just so long. It also read out which lane you should take just for turning. Before the change i can easily navigate the confusing city of Kuala Lumpur because the instruction is clear and concise, now i have to fight with the instruction because 3rd quarter of the time it’s a language i can’t recognise due to the terrible pronunciation.

    Ohh did i mention the ads? They found a way to sneak ads into navigation. Now if you want to turn left 500m ahead, instead of telling you “turn left” , they will tell you to turn left after “xyz shop”. Now you will be looking for that shop instead of turn left. The app is maintained by techbros that never drive

    • goldenoreo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’ve given me flashbacks. I lived in Japan for a few years and occasionally Google would go ahead and read out the street names in Chinese instead of Japanese as though Google maps doesn’t have an exact GPS coordinate for me and thus a pretty good idea of what language those signs should be in. Drove me INSANE. Trying to get around and suddenly my gps is speaking to me in a language I don’t know

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was in New Mexico recently and Google Maps gave me a route from Bandelier National Monument to Santa Fe that included a “shortcut” through the Los Alamos National Laboratory campus. I got to meet a security guard.

    So, yes. I would say I have experienced this.

  • KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, twice this month. It’s taken me through a dirt road (where we got stuck in the mud) and a closed road. Its also told me to turn at places where I cannot or where I must not. I’ve also checked that the car directions are selected and not “bike” or something else.

    • IlIllIIIllIlIlIIlI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A few weeks ago I talked with a big truck driver and he said that Google maps sent him through a mud track. At the end the truck got stuck between two village houses. He lost one our to get out with the help of several neighbors. Its time to change to “Organic maps” or Osmand.

  • criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s an option to prefer fuel saving routes, which are worse most of the time. This was a kinda recent chance and it is enabled by default, try to disable it and see if it helps

    • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It does indicate the “fuel efficient” route pretty clearly though, and always gives multiple other options including the quickest one that isn’t as efficient. If this is what’s causing the issue, OP just needs to look closer at what’s on their screen.

      • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        2 months ago

        needs to look closer at what’s on their screen

        IT guy here. The number of tickets I could close with this as the root cause.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Honestly I wish you were able to. Some of these people have no excuse to be as ill proficient as they are, and maybe that would change if you could just tell them they ‘read mother fucker’ and let nature take it’s course.

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        In my experience, the “quickest” are more fuel efficient than the “fuel efficient” routes, which take me through residential areas (where every intersection is protected, meaning a stop sign in at least 1 direction) or stair-stepping on county roads where the speed-up/slow-down cycle negates the benefit of driving on slower roads.

        • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s fair, although I think that depends a lot on the type of car you drive. There’s an option to tell Maps what type of car you drive (electric, hybrid, or gas), which will change the results, because cars with regenerative breaking often get better “city” milage than “highway” milage.

          It also probably depends on factors like how aerodynamic your vehicle is, because it makes a huge difference above ~50mph (air resistance/drag increases exponentially with speed)

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fun fact, they let you tell them what kind of vehicle you have for the fuel efficient route. So when we told it we have a PHEV, it started recommending more surface streets than highways. Kinda cool.

    • Xavienth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      On routes with few starts and stops, the route with the lower speed limit is the more fuel efficient one. Higher speed means higher drag (by the square of speed).

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Mostly because that would be a shorter route then, cars have gears and are more efficient under a higher load so a higher speed, usually around 100kph is most efficient

  • Asifall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    This isn’t a new thing but I hate anytime it asks me a question. I’ll be driving through an accident scene trying to work out where the cop directing traffic wants me to go and if I’ll need to go a different way because the turn I was gonna make is blocked off and at that precise moment google maps decides it’s a great idea to cover the bottom half of the screen with a “is tHeRe sTiLl An aCcIdEnT hErE?”

    If it’s illegal to use your phone while driving it should be illegal for navigation apps to suddenly require interaction in the middle of navigating.

  • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s definitely been getting worse. The written directions aren’t always accurate. Exits sometimes have the wrong label. Lanes are missing on the highways when they merge and separate.

    I’ve also seen a similar thing with routes not always showing up or giving bad directions. It attempted to take me through a school bus barn and even through someone’s yard once.

  • Lumelore (She/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yep. Multiple times I have had Google maps direct me to back employee only entrances instead of the regular entrances. Sometimes it seems like Google doesn’t even recognize that the front entrance even exists.

  • justtobbi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d like to recommend ‘Magic Earth’ to everyone, who wants a privacy respecting Maps alternative with trafic data. I used it on several >500km trips and it only misguided me once. It uses OSM maps and can navigate offline.

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only real issue with OpenStreetMaps is that the quality varies significantly town-to-town depending on how much love it’s had by local, knowledgable contributors. Road directions are one of the more complex things to configure in OSM, especially with complex multi-lane junctions, and so densely-populated areas and major roads are likely to be quite good, whereas more rural areas can be hit-and-miss.

    • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Does it give you multiple options for a route? Like fastest/using least petrol/no tolls, etc?

      I am currently using Google maps and waze most of the time and tried Organic maps for a while for a more privacy focused option, but it only gives you one option, no alternatives of similar length/time.

      Edit: nevermind, just downloaded it and it does offer alternatives. Looking good as well, will definitely test it, thank you!

    • gencha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You don’t realize a 500km route you take once is shit. It’s when the software sends you on a shit route across town every single day when you measure quality.

      • justtobbi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve driven the same general route a few times and even then, it has been quite reliable. As mentioned, it can depend on the cities and stuff, so you’re best trying it out for yourself :)

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      My biggest gripe with Organic Street Maps (and every OSM) client that I’ve tried is that I can’t find a way to display the destination address when I get close. I do some delivery work and that drives me crazy. Otherwise, it’s great.

      • vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        as they are privacy focused and have significantly fewer users, not yet.

        but, the more users contributing and making requests, the sooner it could be integrated.

        you can help by being one of those users!

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does it save route history? Or destinations? That’s one feature I like with Google, disregarding any privacy concerns.

      • johant@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I use OsmAnd+ and you can configure it to save a track every time you use navigation. It can also send that track live to self hosted tracking servers. You need to enable the trip recording plugin.

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    It coincides with their switch to more and more “AI” black box models. Whereas before they would use a hand-tuned heuristic model to describe whether you are turning, merging, or continuing on a road, they just use a less correct but automagic model where they still inevitably have to tune it a whole lot but it is “AI” so it has the approval of the petty lords of management.

    Incorrect entrances and closed roads are another example. They’re just using satellite and street level imagery and tossing it at some models that spit out things like “door 99% confidence” and “road 98% confidence” while neglecting the question of, “are you actually allowed/able to use this?”

    PS under basically every correct answer in this category is a team of poorly-paid “labelers” whose answers directly turn into the data in the map. Your door-that-is-not-an-entrance was marked entrance because someone making $8/hr only had 10 seconds to review before moving to the next question.

    • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Semi recently had mine try to take me through a private business parking lot which was entirely fenced off, and didn’t even connect on the other side. That was… confusing, to say the least.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Personally, I’ve been seeing way more markers when you zoom in for bigger businesses meaning they are probably going heavy on pay to show.

    • MuffinHeeler@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not to mention my saved places aren’t permanent markers in the map. I’ll zoom in, still can’t see it. Search for it, oh look, there it is, right where I was zoomed in

    • Bongles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yep, one shape is paid for, the other shape is not (I forget, circles or squares), and to actually see the non paying businesses you have to zoom way in now.

      They say it doesn’t affect search

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They switched from giving you the fastest route by default to giving you the one that uses the least gas.
    They also now offer alternative routes that take you past businesses which paid money to Google.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s in your trip options “prefer fuel efficient route”. You can turn it off.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know. But I won’t.
        Hypermiling is as fun to me as driving fast is for others.
        It’s like a mini-game I get to play every time I’m forced to drive a car.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I hypermile casually but I’m not sacrificing travel time to save a bit of gas.

        • MonkRome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ahh, I misinterpreted your post as a complaint. I’m not a hypermiler, but I do find the efficient routes are often the lowest stress routes as well.

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes. I’m not the only one! Maps drives me crazy. As pedestrian it’s borderline unusable especially in European old Cities where there are … actual pedestrian only pathways.

    Organic Maps is a game changer here!