Xavienth

  • 2 Posts
  • 423 Comments
Joined 4 年前
cake
Cake day: 2020年7月18日

help-circle

  • This is like saying the library search engine and Bob the drunkard who looked at the shelf labels and swears up and down he knows where everything is are the same thing.

    Look, ChatGPT is an averaging machine. Yes it has ingested a significant chunk of the text on the internet, but it does not reproduce text exactly as it found it, it produces an average of all the text it has seen, weighted towards what seems like it make sense for the situation. For really common information this is fine. For niche information, it is bullshitting without any indication.








  • You can find the value of ln(-1)¹⁰ by examining the definition of ln(x): the result z satisfies eᶻ=x. For x=-1, that means the z that satisfies eᶻ=-1. Then we know z from euler’s identity. Raise to the 10, and there’s our answer. And like you pointed out, it’s not a particularly helpful answer.



  • Therefore i¹⁰ = ln(-1)¹⁰/pi¹⁰ = -1

    This is true but does not follow from the preceding steps, specifically finding it to be equal to -1. You can obviously find it from i²=-1 but they didn’t show that. I think they tried to equivocate this expression with the answer for e which you can’t do, it doesn’t follow because e and i¹⁰ = ln(-1)¹⁰/pi¹⁰ are different expressions and without external proof, could have different values.






  • Xavienthtogames@hexbear.netSuda51 is OWNED BY CHINA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 天前

    God I remember that fucking bullshit about the Chinese photographer/artist who made a piece dramatizing the crimes of Australia in Afghanistan.

    The Australian flag draped over the Afghan flag shaped as a puzzle piece on the floor.

    And the narrative the Australian media went with was “this is fake news, the image is fake.” Uh, yeah? That’s how art works, it’s not supposed to fool. Quit fucking distracting from the discussion about the crimes of Australia


  • Xavienthtothe_dunk_tank@hexbear.netSmartest ancap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 天前

    What would actually happen is Marie reports the robbery to ADT, and ADT denies the claim because it doesn’t fit their definition of robbery on some technicality decided by a council who doesn’t know any of the details of the robbery because it’s more profitable than costly arbitration.



  • Basically the second one is standard practice, a phased rollout. The only reason you wouldn’t do one is if there’s some really bad exploit that is currently being exploited and you need to fix it now now now. So either somebody fucked up and deployed a regular fucked update as a critical patch, or a critical patch was shoddily made and ended up soft bricking everyone.

    But idk i don’t work in tech.