This guy asks about archival - https://superuser.com/questions/374609/what-medium-should-be-used-for-long-term-high-volume-data-storage-archival

They say to buy a 30TB LTO-8 tape cartridge for $79 - https://www.networkworld.com/article/3638116/why-aren-t-optical-disks-the-top-choice-for-archive-storage.html

ROMs would be useful for storing lots of data for long periods of time without corruption or freeing up space on your SSD for more hot data, that could be automated. They should be cheap and compact. These are useful properties.

  • @sparkingcircuit
    link
    62 years ago

    Anyone who knows about this, please chime in. I’ve been thinking about this very subject for quite some time, though I’ve never put it into words. I have, for a long time, wondered why I couldn’t find PROMs with capacities larger that a few megabytes.

    • @holdengreenOP
      link
      22 years ago

      Where would you buy your PROMs? I figure most ROM implementations should be relatively simple compared to other memories that actually require complex semiconductor fab methods. Maybe it’s just a scale thing.

          • @sparkingcircuit
            link
            12 years ago

            I’ve never seen this website before, it seems useful. Thank you.

              • Arsen6331 ☭
                link
                12 years ago

                They are very cool, but they’re a bit too weak for me. I started off with an 8-bit Arduino Uno, but now use exclusively 32-bit microcontrollers. I have 5 picos that I got with a slight discount that I’m using for my projects. I really like the RP2040, so the pico is an obvious choice. Also, I don’t really use C/C++ to program my microcontrollers, I use and contribute to TinyGo, which is not going to work on the more obscure devices. However, they do seem like really nice chips for when you just want a really cheap device to perform some logic.

                • @holdengreenOP
                  link
                  22 years ago

                  Yeah I’ve thought about porting Teacup firmware to an ultra cheap 3D printer board I’d make. But I think these micros are intended for cheapo products. If your product costs more than like ~$20 you might want to invest in a nicer micro. But I haven’t used them yet although I have some sitting around. I can’t comment on how good they actually are.

                  I’ve only really used Atmel micros but I’ve found their pricing is a little steep. Yeah there are some value Arm M0’s… GigaDevice has some riscv stuff that may be good.

      • Arsen6331 ☭
        link
        12 years ago

        I’d look on DigiKey and Mouser. I did try looking on both, but what I found is that they’re tiny in terms of capacity, so even 1TB costs insane amounts.

  • Amicese
    link
    52 years ago

    Because capitalists are incapable of long-term planning.

    • @holdengreenOP
      link
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Think about how much data sits out there without every really being edited/deleted. So many large datasets including videos, revision systems, and lots of records being taken including blockchains. I wonder what percentage of the data humans put out and store can be comfortably be placed on some cheap scaled ROM like this.

  • Arsen6331 ☭
    link
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t see why not other than the fact that no one is using them for this use case. I’m not sure how expensive a PROM is, but if it’s not too expensive, I’d try buying a lot of them and connecting them all to a microcontroller to see if I can make some sort of mass storage with them.

    • @holdengreenOP
      link
      22 years ago

      The modules we have found are expensive and low capacity. So they are expensive.

      NAND flash is apparently a transistor per cell??? I would expect a ROM type based on nanoscale resistors or something like that would be compact and a cheaper end cost?

      • Arsen6331 ☭
        link
        12 years ago

        The modules we have found are expensive and low capacity. So they are expensive.

        Yeah, that lines up with what I saw.

        NAND flash is apparently a transistor per cell??? I would expect a ROM type based on nanoscale resistors or something like that would be compact and a cheaper end cost?

        I think NAND flash manufacturing is just optimized to such a degree that it’s much cheaper than everything else.

        • @holdengreenOP
          link
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I think NAND flash manufacturing is just optimized to such a degree that it’s much cheaper than everything else.

          I understand but I’m trying to make an argument that the ROMs would be significantly cheaper and more compact given the same scaling… But I wouldn’t know enough to say for sure so I’ll keep reading.

          • Arsen6331 ☭
            link
            22 years ago

            That is very much possible, but the capitalists are only going to scale what they think will get them money now, so it’s doubtful that they’re going to think long-term enough to actually do that.