anarchism is when you reinforce the state, and the more you reinforce it the more anarchisty it is, complete tosser
Average anarchist activity /s
So the strong should control the weak, huh
When you try to be anarchist but just end up being the liberal strawman of your own ideology
“If you think about it, all humans migrated from somewhere in Africa so really everyone’s a colonizer.”
“Very interesting, please face the wall.”
Can’t wait to hear this guy’s take on the CCP and Best Korea.
Apparently he isn’t an anarchist, which really just makes me more confused
maybe their profile pic the ukraine fascist flag and not the anarchy flag :o
deleted by creator
They also only won in 48 because Czechoslovakia shipped them weapons right at the last second.
there are literally only like 4 good twitter users in this whole country, fucking hell
all the good aussies are on hexbear
It’s nice finding Aussies who aren’t proudly racist or ignorant smug assholes for a change.
julian assange isn’t on hexbear
““Anarchists”” advocating for states and borders will never stop amusing me.
He’s literally just a NAFO guy. A lot of what he posts just seems like generic liberal.
So a NATO leftist lmfao these people are too predictable.
Anglo Saxons indigenous marginalized people?
I mean, circa 1100 AD, yeah.
But uh, like, time happens yah know.
nah capitalist settler colonialism is distinct from primitive conquest and accumulation. all the Normans did was (mostly) kill the old nobility and knick their stuff. the saxons were just as the norman peasant or the dijonnais peasant, not a group targeted for dispossession & extermination.
this distinction was observed just within the island of Ireland. the normans took over ireland in the 12th century, same way they did england, but all that came of it were some administrative impositions, and different names on the nobles. in a few centuries, like their compatriots in England spoke English, they were speaking Irish. now in the 16th century, the synthesis of protestantism, a centralizing state, and a developing merchantilist/capitalist economic system drove a different sort of conquest of Ireland. no longer sharing a common religion, the english took all the land from the catholics (irish) & while happy to make them dirt-poor laborers, they systematically kept them from food & killed so many in the wars, the English lords found themselves lacking sufficient labor—thus came the settlers, Good Protestants who wouldn’t rise up, who’d make common cause with the landlords against the indigenous, for fear of being driven off the stolen land
Was gonna say, it absolutely was
This is like when conservatives bring up the way the US used to treat Irish and Italian people.
Yes that was fucking awful, and I would be condemning it, IF I WAS FUCKING ALIVE IN THE 1700 AND 1800s! But yah know things fucking change and so do your priorities.
Edit: and it’s extra funny when they turn around and are like “why do you still care about this thing that happened when your grandpa was in his 20s?” Oh idk maybe that’s like still affecting the current fucking world???
It happened a long time ago and also, England isn’t a French colony rn. They got it back.
A group of plucky young honkies managed to nearly wipe out multiple civilizations using only black powder guns and germ warfare
I’d say the United States of America deserves to control everything
is this guy implying the indigenous folk are colonisers
Anytime an Australian opens their mouth online it is guaranteed to be a dogshit take. We’re basically just little America at this point, but even more determined to be obnoxious and entitled.
Might makes right but you wanna feel like the underdog at the same time
The year is actaully 1023 not 2023, wow who knew
Also Arab tribes have always lived in the region, in fact large parts of modern Isreal and West Bank were part of the Nabatean Kingdom circa 200 BCE, also you know the Philistines, native people mentioned in the fuckin Bible
Yeah, but the philistines had bad takes about art, so they don’t count.