• @whoamiOP
    link
    172 years ago

    I’m a firefox/ublock origin user, but this has huge implications for the web moving forward

  • @FuckBigTech347
    link
    162 years ago

    2-3 years ago I remember there being some talk about this in various forums. I’m really not surprised given that Google is a trash company. I hate how Google alone can just decide what goes into a Web Standard and what a Browser has to do to be “usable”.

    I myself took a shot at writing my own web browser from scratch. Didn’t get that far into it. I lost interest because when I saw all the bullshit that a web browser has to support to be even semi-usable all my enthusiasm went down the drain. It’s literally impossible for a single person, or even a small group to make a quote on quote “usable web browser” from scratch. At this point it would be easier to just throw the current web in the trash and start over, honestly.

    • @whoamiOP
      link
      102 years ago

      writing your own web browser in this day and age seems impossible for a small team of people, let alone one person

    • @holdengreen
      link
      92 years ago

      We’d be better off drafting and experimenting with our own / existing counter standards than trying to make new implementations at this point.

    • CritiGalDesist∞
      link
      22 years ago

      Even giant like Microsoft didn’t dare and just went with Chromium. I admire you :)

  • @Idliketothinkimsmart
    link
    102 years ago

    Bruhh, say it ain’t sooo 😭. Eternal respect to comrade ad block for keeping my internet experience just somewhat more enjoyable.

  • Seirdy
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    Funny that I just noticed this here, right after I posted my own thoughts on the matter: https://lemmy.ml/post/308999

    TLDR: Mv3’s declarativeNetRequest is a really good replacement for a subset of uBlock Origin’s functionality. If it didn’t herald an end to privileged extensions then I’d welcome it. But Google gotta Google; can’t take one step forward without two steps back.

    There are some valid reasons to use Blink; for those use-cases, I’d love to see a “de-Braved-Brave” fork of Brave that removes all the “cryptography-verified, decentralized pyramid scheme” nonsense but keeps the great content blocking.

    • @whoamiOP
      link
      102 years ago

      I don’t trust anything from Brave; whole thing seems like a MLM to me.

      Second best option (after a revolution that eliminates google, I can only dream) is that a large enough org decides to write a different rendering engine so google doesn’t have a monopoly.

      • Seirdy
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        I agree about Brave which is why I said I’d like to see a fork that removes all the cryptocurrency nonsense.

        I think that among the indie crowd (not large orgs/corps) the best we can do is test our sites in other non-mainstream engines and stick to standards. The SerenityOS browser, Servo, and NetSurf are cirrently maintained; there’s also KHTML, Hv3, etc. Supporting one or two fully independent options in addition to the big three could go a long way.

        • @whoamiOP
          link
          12 years ago

          Hv3 was weird, couldn’t understand how to make it work

  • @mlcolo
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Removed by mod