Somehow paying for Netflix is fine but god forbid I want to watch a 10 hour loop of the DS9 intro without ads.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Youtube constantly demonitizes content creators, while protecting doxxers and content thieves. I will not be giving them a single red cent.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re giving too much credit, Youtube doesn’t care and is running on AI autopilot. This benefits IP abusers, thieves, and trolls and hurts legitimate creators. But it’s not on purpose, it’s just indifference.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This right here. I did youtube premium one time to watch the first season of cobra kai. And then immediately dropped it when that same month 3 content creators I followed all came forward with videos of how they were getting obviously fraudulent copyright strikes, demonetized over things that they didn’t do wrong and youtube just screwing them over cause they could.

      A company that makes billions in profits could easily afford to put better content creator support in place and cover costs or disputes against content creators so none of the people who make their site profitable in the first place ever have to worry if they’ll still be paid for the hours and hours they devote to their channel only for a troll or bad faith actor to make a false claim on their videos and irrevocably remove income.

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Moral reasons

        🙄

        A corporation can blatantly violate the law, bribe politicians, ignore its TOS whenever its suits them, but a second somebody wants to use a heavily subsidised service without being assaulted by advertising, a gaggle of concern trolls pop up to lecture about “stealing service”. Buddy, simping for Alphabet will get you nowhere.

        • Anemia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you are against them on a moral basis then use another service, I imagine that has a more negative impact on them. If you just want no ads, pay for it.

          I hate ads as much as the next guy and use a variety of blockers but i’ll pay for any service with a reasonable payment method.

            • Anemia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Specifically youtube-videos? None. For similar videos there are a bunch of services, at least to watch for entertainment purpose.

          • Rooty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The price of food items has gone almost 50% up during last year, the wages are not keeping up with inflation, and I already pay for utilities and internet. I ain’t paying shiiiiiiiit.

            • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Okay, so this actually has nothing to do with how YouTube “demonitizes content creators, while protecting doxxers and content thieves”. It’s actually just about you not wanting to pay for it.

              Which is fine! But why lie to yourself about it?

              • Rooty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Why not both? I can disdain YouTube for shitting on creators while refusing to pay for subpar service.

                • Anemia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Wouldn’t it be better then to instead watch those creators on a platform that treats the creators better?

    • Maven (famous)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      This works fine but the main reason I personally have premium is to support the YouTubers I watch. Adblock gets rid of their revenue while premium pays them MORE than just ads do and now I don’t have to worry about it on any platform.

      • AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Premium still gives them hardly anything. Subscribing to their Patreon is better because they get all your money, minus the small fee.

          • nephs
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            They’re better off for life if you donate the money you’d spend with yt once for each, once per month. Many will have their turns.

            • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              That is a ton of work, especially when not every YTer has Patreon or channel memberships. Afaik, YTers do appreciate Premium views since it pays way more than ads.

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It gives them a loot more than ad watchers though. Especially on longer videos (it’s based on watch time)

    • Paul_Stuhl@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I also have No ads, because I use NewPipe. There I can watch all Videos from YouTube, cccBerlin, pearTube and it is also possible to Listen to Music from Bandcamp and Soundcloud.

        • canni@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I use adblock on Firefox on my phone. Used to be fun to jailbreak and install my own apps and stuff, just getting lazier as I age I think

      • petrichorbreeze@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Unless you’re on an iPhone, setting up Revanced takes less than 10 minutes and very rarely breaks anything. If you want to support your YouTube creators, then sure pay for premium, but it baffles me how someone could have the technical prowess to set up a Lemmy account, but then balk at something like this. If anything, mobile might be one of the last frontiers now that they’re starting a war against adblock.

  • Potfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Paying for premium is fine, but premium users letting Youtube off the hook for their corporate greed is annoying. If YT ran reasonable ads like they used to in the olden days I wouldn’t use an adblocker. Don’t even get me started on their garbage search, a multi billion dollar company can and should do better. Then of course there’s the fiasco of their demonetization system, and rules that apply to some but not others. Simply put they don’t deserve to be paid for premium, if their grinch heart grows and they decide to do better as a company I’d honestly pay for premium.

    • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Tbh, I almost caved and got premium, but I have a lot of the same issues with Youtube that you have.

      A big YouTuber was doxxed recently by another big YouTuber, and Youtube did nothing about it. If I was him, I would be going to court.

      • Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        YouTube is trash, and if a viable alternative were to exist then I would switch in a heartbeat.

        But I’m all about convenience, so until that alternative exists, if I have to give some money to YouTube to have that convenience, I’ll do it.

    • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      While the monopoly that YT has as a video platform is definitely an issue, the cost of maintaining the content has definitely risen now. 480p vs 4k videos have a ton of difference in bandwidth, no matter how much Internet speeds have evolved over the years.

      I used Google Play Music (RIP) and moved into YT Music for my music streaming needs. The cost of YT premium was marginally higher so I switched for it.

      The major issue with YT Premium is that they still collect the data from YT to show targeted ads, but I use also use uBlock, so that doesn’t really bother me as much.

      Point is, video hosting services are expensive. The quantity (not quality) of content on YT is way higher than any othet streaming service, and maintaining that for free is pretty close to impossible. The only possible alternative would be a government backed video platform and that’s definitely worse.

    • rengoku2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Us premium users have no obligation to help non premiums.

      At the end of the day Youtube or Google offer no ads experience for us and we get it. Transaction is completed.

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ll pay to not be exposed to ads. I’ll also pay to support a service I get value from. So I’m paying for YouTube premium, Netflix, Hulu. etc. When a service with media I want that has a more desirable corporate structure becomes available I’ll pay for that and maybe get rid of other services. I also occasionally sail the high seas if the thing I want isn’t available on any of the services I’m already paying for.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I just find the cost of Premium to be too high.

    Here in Sweden it costs about 120SEK/month, that is far too much, I’d happily pay 60-70SEK/month, that would be worth it to me.

    And would still give rhem more money than me not watching ads

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They really do fuck us in the Nordics. It’s DKK179 (SEK281, USD26) for the family plan here in Denmark. Granted that’s the whole family getting YouTube Premium and Music, but that’s also I think the highest price anywhere in the world.

    • ribboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Only service where I’ve done the region thing. Paying 15 kr a month because I signed up through Argentina.

    • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The price is insane just for getting rid of ads. Amazon Prime is cheaper than that and gives you a ton of benefits.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Eh, I watch a lot of youtube to and from the office, for me 60SEK/month would be worth it

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    You think that’s bad? Mention you use a HP printer sometime. I dare you to try it.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Trigger warning:

      I have an HP inkjet printer attached to my Windows 11 machine playing YouTube Premium in Chrome without an ad blocker.

      Edit: it’s a joke, people.

    • Redrum714@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well owning a HP inkjet is an objectively stupid thing to do.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Eh, HP has always worked fine for us. I have two sitting here, actually - one is an all-in-one from ~2009 that we printed our wedding programs on when it was new, and it still works fine, but ink is getting harder to find for it, and we had a scare with the irreplaceable print head a few years ago (I got it working, using HP’s “try this if you’re out of options, but it’s unlikely to work” directions, but we realized it was probably time to consider replacing it).

        The other is a few years old and is one of the ones with the subscription service. We’ve had a good experience with it, and I spend less on ink than I did with the old one, but that upsets a LOT of people.

        • End0fLine@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I may have exaggerated a bit. We use both HP and Konica Minolta printers at work. Our HP printers are excellent compared to KM.

          I haven’t used a printer at home since I was a kid. I bet the situation is different for printers that aren’t going 365 days a year.

          I will say that I do not like HP’s ink “DRM” shenanigans.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            First, it’s nice to get a reasonable response to my comment. Most of the responses about HP printers are people foaming at the mouth. Even a few here, in a thread meant to be funny, generated some of that.

            Yeah, I might go with a laser next time. I’ve read that Brother makes a pretty good laser printer, and I see color models are like $250, which isn’t bad. We’ll see. No major rush right now. I would miss the flatbed scanner; I do use that (maybe as much as the printer) for random things.

            Oh…haha…I just went to Brother’s site to look at one, and oh look, there’s a toner subscription service!

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Using an HP printer is like playing Russian Roulette with a ton of loaded bullets. I say this as someone with multiple HP printers.

    • Cysioland
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use an HP inkjet with original cartridges

    • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Brand new: https://grayjay.app/

      Has downloads, dislikes, Youtube, Odysee, Rumble, Twitch, Kick, and more plugins, no ads, can cast to devices, offline subscriptions and was paid for by Louis Rossman. Out for a week now. Loving it so far. Just needs Sponsorblock and it will replace Newpipe+Sponsorblock for me. It’s open source but paid software.

      We offer a way to pay for the app once. The app will function identically without paying.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I subscribe to YouTube Music and have since the Play days (R.I.P.). Watching videos without ads is just a perk.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is basically my stance. Its also one of a very few subs I use, I don’t really care to watch streaming services or to pay for the slightly (maybe?) better other music streaming services.

    • dmrzl@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I still have Premium but could never accept YT music as a former Play user. Why did they end the best music streaming service for this unusable trash?

      Spotify is still worse than Play was, but at least it’s good at recommending music. YT music is worse in every regard. Except for smart watch integration maybe.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Play was the best, especially in the early days with the professionally curated (by humans) play lists. I discovered so much new music. AI generated playlists are terrible.

  • ranoss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think I’m more ok with people playing for YouTube premium. It still helps the creators on YouTube more directly than Netflix

  • Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I pay for it so my kids’ accounts don’t have ads. They’re too young to sort out all the edge cases that aggressive ad blocking generates and for a bonus we get youtube music.