• doctordevice@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you sue? I’d have been livid enough to try to sue. IANAL, but at a minimum I would hope that would be trespassing.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some places have bylaws on maximum lawn height and you can actually be fined for letting it go. That’s how insane people are about lawns.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought it was virtually all places. I’m surprised the other guy could even let the lawn go native.

      • doctordevice@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not everywhere is in an HOA. And many people allow native vegetation on purpose to give local wildlife something to eat (see OP).

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean that’s probally overkill, that person was either OCD or was thinking he was doing them a favor. That sounds like a great way to have a pissed off neighbor and a potentially hostile neighborhood

      • doctordevice@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d feel a little different (still pissed) if it was a next door neighbor who extended their mow. But to cross the street and change someone’s property without permission is already hostile to me.

    • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt that I could have demonstrated real harm, or even proved that he did it. I got back into town a week later and my brother, who had been watching the house, said “huh, the guy across the street mowed the front yard”.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      By the letter of the law it probably is, but if they hadn’t expressly been told not to it won’t go anywhere.