• underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I’ve seen they’re focusing on the “budget already allocated, nothing could be done” argument and just completely ignoring the part where something was in fact done, but not to prevent it.

      • redtea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if it was a contractual thing, it would’ve been better to breach the contract, pay damages, and not build the wall. Monsters.

      • ditty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly what’s so shitty about this. The MF waived 26(!?) laws to get this to go, just because the money was there? The hell?