• underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    From what I’ve seen they’re focusing on the “budget already allocated, nothing could be done” argument and just completely ignoring the part where something was in fact done, but not to prevent it.

    • redtea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if it was a contractual thing, it would’ve been better to breach the contract, pay damages, and not build the wall. Monsters.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly what’s so shitty about this. The MF waived 26(!?) laws to get this to go, just because the money was there? The hell?