• 30mag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      179
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      The headline makes it sound like he physically assaulted her because they need to clickbait. The article makes it clear that is not what took place.

      Former President Donald Trump attacked Judge Arthur Engoron’s clerk in a now-deleted social media post while in the courtroom with her on Tuesday.

      Politico reporter Kyle Cheney wrote, “Trump, on Truth Social, is attacking Judge Engoron’s *clerk,—who is literally in the courtroom with him—while calling her ‘Chuck Schumer’s girlfriend’ and posting a link to her Instagram account. I suspect this will be an exhibit in some gag order arguments.”

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        67
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is gonna be like Capone: All these crimes and the thing that gets Trump behind bars is violating a gag order.

        Because you know he can’t abide by it.

        • spider@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because you know he can’t abide by it.

          If there’s any such thing as Incitement Tourette’s, he’s got it.

        • lando55@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Question since I’m genuinely lost when it comes to this - does forcing a gag order by these actions benefit Trump in any way? Does it ensure no one is able to speak about the case, or is it just limited to him?

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because that’s not technically illegal until the gag order, which went into effect after the post was made.

            • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              He wasn’t threatening. He was insulting. The word “attack” is misleading in this context.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                The threat wasn’t explicit, but it was certainly implicit. That’s why he posted her personal social media info. He is fully aware he has an army of followers that will take that and run with it. I don’t think that he should be able to get away with that so easily.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Which is why he now has a gag order. The act of posting someone’s ig isn’t illegal, but now it is with the gag order.

              • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                He was also inciting his followers.

                Whether or not it rises to the level of “inciting imminent lawless action” is a different topic, but it’s not like he was merely insulting someone to their face - he was pointing tens of millions of his psycho followers at her.

        • 30mag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you expect that the people in the court room to be monitoring Trump’s social media accounts?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I expect the judge to do something about it once he found out more than a narrow gag order, but apparently that’s asking too much.

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      For real! Putting it on social media WHILE IN COURT, should be the same as if he stood up and said it in front of the judge.

    • Nurgle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m so tired of people saying the headline was misleading because they lack basic reading comprehension… but that’s not the case here. Was expecting to see he threw his phone at the clerk or something.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        That would have been great to see on video… but he probably would have missed her “Bigly”.

  • stormtrooper@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man, this guy is committing more crimes as he’s on trial for crimes.

    Posting their IG account is pretty much a direct threat by mobilizing his stupid fans.

  • 2piradians@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is who they choose for their savior, this geriatric child. He’s like the classic fast food manager who still has the high school mindset, but with money (for now) and inexplicable influence.

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Schumer’s girlfriend, Alison R. Greenfield, is running this case against me. How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately!!” he wrote. Despite his claim, there is no evidence of a relationship between Schumer and Greenfield beyond taking a photo together at one point.

    It doesn’t matter. The average trumpster is so fucking dumb, they will eat it up. Warping it into a fact in their heads.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s called stochastic terrorism. When Trump publicly names someone as an enemy, he won’t be the one to physically attack them.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I read this as “the average trumpeter is so fucking dumb…” and assumed you were either trombone or French horn. 😄

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    The comments on Twitter are brain-meltingly stupid. The MAGA morons actually think Greenfield is Schumer’s girlfriend because Trump made that post.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Former President Donald Trump attacked Judge Arthur Engoron’s clerk in a now-deleted social media post while in the courtroom with her on Tuesday.

    Trump appeared in a New York courtroom for the second day of his trial of Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit alleging that he committed business fraud.

    James accused the former president of inflating his net worth by billions of dollars to obtain benefits such as better bank loans and reduced tax bills between 2011 and 2021.

    He posted a photograph taken of Greenfield with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, calling for the case to be dismissed over the picture.

    Politico reporter Kyle Cheney wrote, "Trump, on Truth Social, is attacking Judge Engoron’s *clerk,—who is literally in the courtroom with him—while calling her ‘Chuck Schumer’s girlfriend’ and posting a link to her Instagram account.

    Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested a gag order in the federal case surrounding the January 6, 2021, riot at the United States Capitol building.


    The original article contains 566 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Mago@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why this awful reddit-style click bait? The truth about Trump is bad enough as is, no need to lie about him.

  • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Trump attacking people with words is common. If he physically attacked her, probably the term “assault” would be used, and also, the headline wouldn’t have to point out that she was physically present at the time.

  • cbarrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Damn. Newsweek has sunk so low from their former self.

    From the headline, I thought “attacked” meant “assaulted,” and that’s obviously the connection the editor wanted me to make.

    But no, Trump made a disparaging post against this woman on his fake Twitter network. Shitty, but not as bad as the headline implied.