In an impassioned and at times furious speech, departing Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley defiantly proclaimed that the US military does not swear an oath to a “wannabe dictator.”

It was a bitter and pointed swipe that appeared unmistakably targeted at former President Donald Trump, who has in recent days accused Milley of “treason” and suggested that he should be put to death for his conduct surrounding Trump’s bid in 2021 to remain in office despite losing the presidential election.

“We are unique among the world’s militaries,” Milley said. “We don’t take an oath to a country, we don’t take an oath to a tribe, we don’t take an oath to a religion. We don’t take an oath to a king, or a queen, or a tyrant or a dictator.”

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    1 year ago

    • Trump- a twice/impeached treasonous draft-dodging rapist coward is accusing a decorated military general of treason.

    THAT is how stupid this guy is.

    • close to half of America is voting for a twice/impeached treasonous draft-dodging rapist coward.

    THAT is how stupid America is.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      close to half of America is voting for a twice/impeached treasonous draft-dodging rapist coward.

      It’s more like a third that has an outsized influence due to gerrymandering and disincentivizing voters. Still, the fact that it is that many and Trump actually stands a chance of re-election shows what a dumpster fire the country is.

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      While I question the intelligence of the MAGA crowd as well, I feel like I have to constantly remind people that the other half of the people who would vote for him are really voting against neoliberalism, even tho they can’t describe it as such.

      They’ll say globalism, they might even take a swipe at wall street or corporations. NAFTA, “Elites” etc etc.

      They’re struggling just like everyone else due to late stage capitalism and they don’t care how it ends, just that it does.

      Mind you theyre also statistically white and think they’ll be in the in group when our money becomes less valuable than toilet paper and weather it all fine, which is delusional.

      There’s the haves and the have nots. Even security for the rich, after the walls fell, will still be servants, not equals.

      I say all this so those inclined can see there is actually a good amount of material we all agree on, and if you can approach it without instigating their pearl clutch reflex, some can even be brought into the light.

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They deserve nothing less than ridicule and shame for their beliefs. They have the same access to information as everyone else, and they CHOSE to be ignorant to it. They CHOSE to ignore it. I have no sympathy or compassion for these nitwits.

        And for the record- they’ll clutch their pearls without the need of anything to initiate a reflex. It’s their default stance to everything.

        Fuck them. The gloves are off. They deserve nothing more then to be drowned in the swamp their beloved leaders created to drain.

        • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s not a solution and you know it. I feel ya my man, I do.

          You don’t need sympathy for them. You don’t need to forgive anyone for them - you do that shit for yourself, so you’ll be free of the negativity of their weight and move forward clear of them.

          Don’t let them define the limits of your virtues. Don’t let anyone tell you who you are (which is essentially the same thing). That’s for you to tell them.

          Most are probably a lost cause. Not all, for sure. Look at them like you would a wounded animal and for reasons we don’t know they blame us. It’s much easier to understand and anticipate, therefore mitigate the pain they’re choosing to propagate. But over generations…we can teach their children tolerance. And patience. Hence their war on education (the ones showing up at PTA meetings, not the ones trying to loot the budget).

          I’m one of the first to respond to fascist violence with violence. Fighting nazis is a great family tradition of mine, going back 80 years. I’m no Gandhi, MLK. I’m much more aligned with Malcolm and Hampton. I’ll let the Gandhi’s have the mic and lead from the ideals, but while theyre sheparding the high road, I’m defending on the low road.

          I say that because if the answer is to just damn half the population, then you’ve got to put more effort into your answer. Or just do what I do, which is let others more eloquent elucidate. I don’t need to sway anyone’s opinions, hell sometimes I’m the last person who should have the mic. Knowing this is a strength, not a weakness.

          What I do know is that Hate isn’t the way. Every spiritual or moral teacher in history has said the same thing. But I don’t need hate to fight, simply resignation to the task at hand, like putting down a wounded animal. If anything it makes me more cognizant in the moment.

            • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              An attitude they share as well. Eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

              Ya gotta leave them able to see. And then show them you have the same capacity for cruelty, but only dole it harsh to the ringleaders.

              • Pratai@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Thanks for the pep talk Ghandi, but I’m going to give them what they deserve and nothing more. They took advantage of patience, kindness, and cheek-turning. That time is over. No more.

                It’s scorched-earth time. If you don’t like it, the drum circles are that way.

                • Richard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That attitude is illusionary and will get you nowhere, don’t forget that you and your radical group do not have any significant backing from society and that you WILL be arrested and put on trial if you attempt to take unlawful actions like violating a person’s bodily integrity or destroying property. The world doesn’t revolve around you, there are millions more reasonable people for each single one of violent radicals like yourself.

      • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a great point. Seeing the current state of US politics this way might be the first step in steering it towards some sort of normalcy.

  • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    President Donald Trump, who has in recent days accused Milley of “treason” and suggested that he should be put to death for his conduct surrounding Trump’s bid in 2021 to remain in office despite losing the presidential election.

    no u.

    It’s comically simple how transparent fuckheads like him become once you tune into the pattern. Accusations are confessions, gaslight, obstruct, project, and all that

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also think he was trying to get ahead of this news of Milley criticizing him. In MAGA world, now Milley only did that to ‘get back’ at Trump.

  • Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trump’s military followers don’t give a shit about the constitution, they believe America and it’s government is about what they as Americans (the real ones) want.

    They act like they believe the constitution is a magical document able to agree with them no matter how they charge their opinion, adapting to internal inconsistencies and all. And if the constitution agrees with them no matter what, it doesn’t matter beyond being an authority to appeal to for the sake of controlling others.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      They act like they believe the constitution is a magical document able to agree with them no matter how they charge their opinion, adapting to internal inconsistencies and all.

      Hey, that’s also exactly how they treat the Bible!

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t need literacy when you have imagination and confidence.

        It’s very convenient that god would speak to them through such accessible means.

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still vividly remember watching the Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Miley personally escorting Donald Trump through peaceful protesters being beaten and gassed to a Church Trump had never been to, to hold up a bible Trump had never read. Don’t try selling me Mark fucking Miley, that fucking fascist enabler can go straight to hell.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In an impassioned and at times furious speech, departing Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley defiantly proclaimed that the US military does not swear an oath to a “wannabe dictator.”

    And his tenure as chairman has provoked fierce debate among military experts: Was Milley too willing to wade into the realm of domestic politics, or did he stand in the breach to protect a democracy in peril?

    On Friday, as he handed over the reins of the chairmanship to Gen. CQ Brown, the embattled Army general gave a fierce defense of his view of the military’s defining ethos: to defend, if necessary with the life’s blood of those in uniform, the Constitution of the United States.

    House Speaker Kevin McCarthy appears to lack the votes to pass a last-ditch stopgap bill to extend government funding beyond Saturday.

    Two days after the attack on the Capitol, Milley – concerned that Trump “had gone into a serious mental decline” and might “go rogue” – instructed senior operations officers from the National Military Command Center not to take orders from anyone unless he was involved, according to Bob Woodward and Robert Costa’s book, “Peril.”

    He also made a now-controversial phone call in the days following the attack intended to reassure Beijing that the United States was stable and that it was not considering a military strike on China.


    The original article contains 962 words, the summary contains 225 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • voidavoid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    So… if they don’t swear an oath to a country, to whom are they sworn?

    • fuzz00713@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Constitution…

      United States Army Oath of Enlistment

      “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God”

      • auraness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is the oath of enlistment, not the oath commissioned officers take. Officers only swear to uphold the Constitution.

        • fuzz00713@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          United States Army Oath of Commissioned Officers

          “I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God”

          Only difference is no promise to follow the presidents orders.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          … according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

          That last bit negates any requirement to obey unlawful orders.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            True, they still have to uphold the constitution; but if a tyrannical government changes it or interprets it differently, then it isn’t necessarily unlawful or against the constitution to follow a tyrannical order. And that’s scary.

            • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a pretty stupid tautology. “If they change the law, it’s not illegal.” And?

              There are no laws that can’t be changed. That’s why you need to vote in all elections.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          …according to regulations and the UCMJ

          You missed that part. If the POTUS orders them to do something against regulations (and against the constitution) then they have a duty to refuse those orders.

          • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They really hammered this home in basic. I remember being really suprised by it, having thought as an airman basic I had to do anything I was ordered without question.

            Now, the truth is, for your everyday enlisted person, the chances of being given an actually illegal order is basically 0.

            Still, it was nice to know that there are mechanisms is place to protect me if I was told to do something truly horrible.

            • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, watching Nazis get prosecuted after World War 2 was a good wake-up call. The armed forces realized that “I was just following orders” wasn’t a viable defense, and they really started pushing the fact that service members had a duty to refuse obviously illegal orders.

        • fuzz00713@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is true. The President also swears to uphold and defend the constitution. Ordinarily that isn’t a problem.
          Sadly in Milleys case it was a problem and he was left in a a largly untenable position.

        • kirklennon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just to add, officers take a different oath that doesn’t include the obeying orders line:

          I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The swear an oath to uphold the constitution. It’s a relatively minor difference between swearing to a country. Basically, soldiers have a duty to refuse orders that they know to be illegal, even if those orders are coming from the POTUS. So if the POTUS tries to order all of the generals to DSP something against the constitution, they have a duty to refuse; Because they haven’t sworn an oath to the POTUS; They’ve sworn an oath to the constitution.

      • voidavoid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya know, fair. I offered the same suggestion to someone on another post just the other day.

        That being said, providing summaries that stop one sentence short of relevant information to turn them into clickbait, not that helpful.

    • millie@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is this being downvoted? Not everyone is an army nerd and knows all this shit.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Understanding the relationship of the US military to the US government is essential civics knowledge. Like understanding the 3 branches of government

        • millie@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, no it isn’t. It’s some extremely niche shit that 90% of people know very little about.

        • millie@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, but the video cuts off just before the answer and the page is formatted to draw attention away from the article.