• paholg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re jumping all over the place and it’s funny. Let’s go back to your earlier claim: “The US has been the bad guys in every war it’s been in”. Were the US the “bad guys” in WW2? Yes or no?

    • 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [they/she]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re jumping all over the place and it’s funny.

      No, I was providing additional support to the claim that even in WW2, the US aren’t the good guys.

      Were the US the “bad guys” in WW2? Yes or no?

      Yes, I would call the country responsible for the Nazis (the Nazis were inspired by the U.S. and actually thought it went too far with the one-drop rule) and the only country to use two nuclear bombs on civilians on a country that was already ready to surrender the bad guys.

      • paholg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Amazing. Let’s try another. England in WW2: good guys or bad guys?

        • 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [they/she]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ll follow Comrade Mao’s advice and shut up instead of speaking nonsense as I haven’t done enough research on England’s role in WW2.

        • REEEEvolution
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Towards whom? To their indian subjects? They were worse than the nazis. To the USSR after finally siding with them? To the USSR when they were planning to bomb Baku and send troops to Finland? To Czechslovakia when they sold them out to germany and poland? To the USSR when they deliberately stalled the creation of what would become the allies and instead helped Germany?