I mean specifically, what criteria does a webpage have to fulfill for it to be considered web3 compliant?
Because all I see around the web are people waxing poetic about freedom, ownership and whatnot without really saying anything. There’s no consensus, there’s no whitepaper, just… vague, nondescript ideas.
vague, nondescript ideas.
^ this is it. 🤣
I can’t figure out what web3 is either, despite knowing several people who work for Web3 Foundation (which has no relation to the W3C, btw), but I can tell you that it definitely isn’t a thing that a web page can be “compliant” with like HTML 4.01 or something.
Something about metaverse and decentralization based on blockchain, drummed up by big tech companies.
Basically, when users can interact with blockchain on your webpage.
a mix of gambling, pyramid schemes, and money laundering
Removed by mod
What centralised database? What problem is this trying to solve?
Removed by mod
So wouldn’t ISP’s and corporations have to essentially rebuild the entire internet to do this sort of thing? I’m afraid that doesn’t sound cost effective and likely won’t get off the ground for capitalistic reasons alone.
Removed by mod
Good to know! I appreciate your response. Well laid out.
I’ve heard other decentralization technologies like IPFS also count as Web3. Or Git, I’ve even heard. So the Fedi might as well be considered Web3 ;)
kind of a scam (AFAIK) that is trying to be pushed on to the public in an awkward way.
thats my impression at face value.
