I don’t think people even want articles with no bias. Like sure you could have “no bias news” that states only objective facts without any leading language or analysis. That would be “unbiased” but boring as fuck. It wouldn’t be useful or interesting in like 94% of cases, assuming for anything newsworthy you could even know the objective facts of a situation. You could have “no bias news” that tries to be interesting with analysis but it would have to start at the beginning of history every single article to give the True Context to every situation. Otherwise you aren’t really letting the reader decide because you’re leaving out some context somewhere. It would be impossible to read or write such an article.
Like what does “unbiased media” even mean. It’s non existent. Anyone who wants “unbiased media” has zero media literacy and should not be anywhere near media to begin with
I would argue that even an unbiased news source would still have bias on the basis of what stories they cover, it’s not like newspapers can be omniscient
But then it’s not an unbiased news source to begin with.
Like
is always saying, the atomic unit of propaganda isn’t lies, but emphasis.
Gonna start up a site called truemediabiasfactcheck.com
14·1 month agoMedia Bias Red Check.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
Bit idea: red checks for Mastodon/Lemmy/etc. accounts verified as True Commies
I’d shill for it.
