The world’s first commercial supercritical carbon dioxide power generator has begun operation in Southwest China’s Guizhou Province. It is viewed as a milestone in changing the power generation mode relying on steam for more than a century. China calls the project “Chaotan-1.” CGTN’s Zheng Yibing speaks to experts from Nuclear Power Institute of China about it.

Why is this such a big deal? Because traditional power generation relies on steam driven turbines, even in nuclear reactors. The thermodynamic losses in the process are substantial and a major barrier to more efficient power generation. With superheated CO2 as the medium, the efficiency of the energy conversion can be greatly increased and losses reduced.

    • 201dberg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Next can we overcome the turbine? We got like what? Solar? And the a dozen ways of turning a damn turbine.

  • Commiejones
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    Scientific breakthroughs are cool and all but engineering breakthroughs are awesome. Like people have known about possibility and benefits of doing this for decades they just didn’t do it… until now.

    • cfgaussianOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      Progress that actually benefits people and not just the bottom line of corporations is cool.

  • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    once china gets their new chip fabs going: in x more years i wouldn’t be surprised if they start doing MHD turbines. they’ll have the experience from the molten salt reactors at that point too

  • Malkhodr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Is sCO2 more efficient as a heat transfer medium then Helium gas? I’m more familiar with Nuclear High Temperature Gas Reactors where He coolant is seen as a massive advancement from steam in both efficiency and safety.

    • cfgaussianOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      This isn’t my area of expertise, but here’s a couple of papers that might answer your question:

      Comparative Performance Analysis of Recuperative Helium and Supercritical CO2

      SCO2 and CO2 as Working Fluids for Power Generation and Storage

      My initial thoughts are that Helium is much lighter so maybe it requires a higher operating pressure to have the same efficiency, and the smaller molecule size could possibly lead to leakage issues? As i said, i’m not an expert.

    • rando895 [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Am a physicist who was educated at an institution with super conducting magnets.

      Helium is so scarce at this point labs are moving away from it in favour of other methods. So regardless of it being technically better or not, co2 is everywhere and helium is rare.

      Liquid helium keeps things cold but is (in some super conducting magnets anyway) often insulated by liquid nitrogen to prevent it from boiling off as quickly. At bare minimum the cost of helium would likely be prohibitive, ignoring everything else.

  • darkernations
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thanks for the share - so many things here I didn’t even know was a thing.