• ghost_laptop
    link
    fedilink
    83 years ago

    Fucking shittypedia. I wish we could make a coup d’etat among Wikipedia’s editors, fucking bastards.

    • @pimentoOP
      link
      63 years ago

      Wikipedia is based in the United States, which means that it is controlled by the US government one way or another. So the only option is to create alternatives.

      • ghost_laptop
        link
        fedilink
        43 years ago

        Sure, I just don’t think you’re achieving the same, if you create an alternative you’re going to get a lot less people reading that, and also it will not have the enormous amount of information Wikipedia has.

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          All content in the Wikipedia is libre, if lack of content is your concern you can just fork the Wikipedia.

          • ghost_laptop
            link
            fedilink
            43 years ago

            And who’s going to maintain the thousands of thousands of articles? Sure, some may not need constant updating, but a lot will, unless you constantly fetch all the data.

            • poVoq
              link
              fedilink
              13 years ago

              The same (and more) people doing it currently… you want to make a better non-US controlled Wikipedia? I am sure you will be able to motivate people to help you if that is your genuine goal.

              But people will realize if the only goal is to replace the US centric view with a China centric one and probably stay with the original.