• Faux
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why would they choose a product owned by a German non-profit over a product owned by a Chinese company?

    • sudo_halt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      One is libre software by a non-profit, another is a horrible ad ridden piece of shit whose only merit is that a Chinese capitalist asshole is behind it instead of an American capitalist asshole

      • Faux
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        A Chinese capitalist asshole is a capitalist asshole that can be controlled. A German non-profit is an actor that’s totally out of control.

        A piece of free software that’s developed by an organization under control of a socialist state would be better, yes. But with what is already there, I’m not surprised what was the lesser evil from perspective of CPC.

        • sudo_halt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Control”? It’s free software the CPC could make their own endorsed fork and just roll with it

          Multiple Chinese companies make their own Linux distro for national consumption, there is even precedent for this

          • mistermodal@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            Sudo if they used LibreOffice this then they would just be mocked for not using something made in China it would send a different message than what is intended. It’s symbolic, saying China does not need western devs

          • 小莱卡
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Yeah, probably the consultants on IT for the CPC are outdated if there are any. WPS is just the norm there so i can understand why they went for that, the owner likely is part of the CPC too so there is that nuance too.

          • Faux
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, it would be cool if CPC made their own fork of LibreOffice and endorsed it instead if WPC.

            But they don’t atm and endorsing LibreOffice risks endorsing a hostile actor that could use it against PRC.

          • Faux
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Also, about Linux distros, Huawei recently made their own independent OS with their own kernel.

    • big_spoon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      i have experience with wps, and usually locks documents,and you have to jump a lot of hoops to open a document with that format or making a freaking pdf or download the document in your pc from the nefarious online interface, the chinese have to make something like libreoffice, not another word

      • mistermodal@lemmy.mlBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well I sure hope they have an open source software scene in China then 🐋 or all hope is lost