• darkernations
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Maybe but I am not sure ultras as a group have any sufficient political presence globally. I am not sure the author/editors are smart enough to target them specifically let alone WSJ be aware of their presence to merit propaganda aimed at them. Collectively western propaganda and intelligence win historically because of the sheer size of capital they put behind their schemes (backed by populations benefiting from the unequal exchange and security apparatus barbarism) - individuals may be evil and smart but as organisations they are large and blundering. You would think by now they would deftly versed in marxist-leninism - you know just from the viewpoint in defeating their enemy. However, their propaganda is so weak in substance that a superficial overview of an ML understanding of the world is sufficient for westerners to breakthrough their smokescreen (if they wanted to). I think one of Marx’s key breakthrough is how capital after being reified can defend itself “organically”.

    • 小莱卡
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      its definitely weird, but i do think there is an abundance of ultras in the west who despise China more than the US itself. Also not every article has to cater the largest groups, articles like this can cater liberals and ultras alike.

      • -6-6-6-
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I can testify to that; there are a considerable group of “leftists” who despise China.