Dialectical materialism doesn’t work on a premise of “based” or “not based”, rather it’s more like “there are based things that align with proletarian interests, we currently need those so we support those, the other ones are cringe bourgeois garbage”.
“there are based things that align with proletarian interests, we currently need those so we support those, the other ones are cringe bourgeois garbage”
I.e., critical support. Or describing countries and people in terms of “70% good, 30% bad” (for example) instead of simply good or bad.
Dialectical materialism doesn’t work on a premise of “based” or “not based”, rather it’s more like “there are based things that align with proletarian interests, we currently need those so we support those, the other ones are cringe bourgeois garbage”.
I.e., critical support. Or describing countries and people in terms of “70% good, 30% bad” (for example) instead of simply good or bad.