• Shrike502
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s a strange event. So the government privatised the port (which we all know goes swimmingly, just look at post-Soviet Russia), China swoops in with investments (which is normal), but then gets a century long lease. Why? What for? Do they get exclusive rights for using the port?

    Just strange stuff all around

    • SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Privatization” but the owning company is another country’s state corporation - come to think of it, that also happened to British Rail, with big parts of the line being bought up by other European countries’ state train companies.

      This all happened pre-COVID too - most of the articles about the Belt and Road failing are about debts going bad directly as a result of COVID’s trade slowdown, so whatever the heck is going on it appears to be to be a one off at the very least.

      • Shrike502
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I never said BaR is failing. I am merely trying to parse the logic of action. And so far I am unable to

        • SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sorry I didn’t mean to imply you were, it’s just that almost every article I fouund talking about this was covering it from the angle of “here’s why the BAR initiative is collapsing (2023 edition)”.