Merely want to provide a point of view, and not concern trolling, from a demsoc point of view, and my own takeaways from India’s Independence.

Anarchy is perhaps the best way to bring revolutions, but is only an intermediary political structure and not a permanent one. In India, the one who got us freed from British Raj Anglos was Bhagat Singh, an anarcho communist. Gandhi was symbolic in terms of peace and diplomacy but was not the real hero.

For small populations on the scale of a village, structures like anarchy or pure (non representative) democracy can work well. For populations any bigger, and they fail, because too many people cannot think and run on the same protocol by human nature.

The abolishment of a state for large scale populations will bring more chaos than what already exists in corrupt plutocratic capitalist representative democracies, like India and USA. Abolishment of state will again result in groupism, in the form of local thug groups, which will have no law to protect the women and children, and again result in a society ruled by whoever has the most individual (or collective - think of thug coalitions) power.