MLs and some Marxists in general think we’re too idealistic and utopian. Isn’t expecting the state to wither away by itself when it ceases to be useful pretty idealist? I really don’t understand why MLs think that would happen when it hasn’t happened at all in history.
Thanks for the links!
I’m afraid though it doesn’t say anything about Singh being an anarcho-communist 😅, and in fact the wikipedia page claims he was a Marxist. However I’m not giving much credence to wikipedia seeing it’s an imperialist project headed by white men. I think it’s a bit premature to call Singh an anarcho-communist though seeing he also had ties to Marxism, it would probably be more correct to call him a socialist revolutionary.
I cannot cite, I read long ago that he used anarchism temporarily as one of his principles when bringing the revolution with Rajguru, Sukhdev and other people who got us freed from British Raj colonialist imperialism.
Wikipedia is very reliable if you use the talk section. 99% people do not do it. Start doing it and you will realise its value. Anyone who just reads the formatted info on first sight there is simply misguided or pseudo intellectual lmao