“Jackals” and wolves is an academic way of describing degrees of revisionism.

Is classifying people revisionist rats also academic level on this scale? A certain scholar in Wisconsin might have been using American academic language do describe degrees of revisionism.

There is also the strange undialectical manner of being satiated vs being insatiable. Some people have their needs met and others don’t. Those that don’t have their needs met will want to change things. Perhaps you should try to meet everyones needs as much as possible then you’ll have fewer people causing you trouble, but no that would be communism.