• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wonder if the real concern might be potential civil unrest. They can’t say they want to beef up the military to put down riots, so use the bogey man of Russia invading the UK instead.

    • Shaggy0291OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      This was my thought too. 70,000 personnel ain’t shit when you consider London alone is a city of 9 million people. If just 1 out of 9 people got on the streets in London then the entire armed forces would be outnumbered by a factor of more than 10:1.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Exactly, if people in UK start rioting it would descend into civil unrest very quickly with the regime not having any real ability to keep the lid on things.

      • lil_tank
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Problem is, 10 disorganised radlibs with rocks for 1 trained disciplined soldier with a gun is still an absolute win for the state

        • Shaggy0291OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          A bloodbath on the same scale as the Russian red Sunday would dramatically radicalise the public, especially if it took place in London. It would instantly become Britain’s 1905 moment.

          • lil_tank
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure, it’s just sad that they’ll never just look at History and realise that this already happened countless times and that they should skip the “oh no the state is ruthless they’ve just killed 10 000 people” and directly go to the “we’re not letting this happen”