Regardless of if it’s practical to live that way in daily life, the world seems pretty determined. Everything happens because a vast amount of interactions between infinite factors causes it to. You can’t really say you choose between things as many influences have been taken in by you and many things have affected your psychological state. Has everything been practically decided by the big bang? Now, this is not to say we can know everything or predict the future, but we know what’s likely. Socialism or extinction may be inevitable, but we don’t know yet. Socialism can only happen if people keep fighting, regardless. People will be convinced or principled or not. Science seems to agree with this, and only few, like the wrong Sartre would propose we have ultimate free will. So are there any arguments against determinism? I know there is a saying that you’re freer when you recognize how your freedom is restricted, and that recognition may make your actions better, but isn’t there ultimately no freedom?

  • 中国共产党万岁
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    i’m likely dramatically oversimplifying something i don’t fully understand, but bell’s theorem tells us there’s not any model behind the scenes of quantum mechanics

    • 小莱卡
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      More like we don’t have a paradigm to explain the model of quantum mechanics yet.

    • lckdscl [they/them]@whiskers.bim.boats
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Bell’s theorem imposes that a hidden variable theory that makes the spontaneity of quantum measurement unspontaneous is only possible if it is nonlocal.

      Nonlocality means two things can be correlated and their corresponding nature be known simultaneously at once due to this correlation. Once you know one, you know the other, without any relaying of information between them.