• @knfrmity
    link
    62 years ago

    I don’t think these two things are mutually exclusive. The US can engage (sometimes successfully, from their perspective) in multiple small scale interference operations while also being incapable of fighting a large scale war successfully.

    The objectives of military bloat are more capitalist class interests as well rather than outright military strength and preparedness. The expansion of bases around the world for example has been used to cement dollar hegemony, and the insane military budgets and boondoggles only serve to enrich the primary shareholders of Lockheed, Raytheon, et al.

    • @Shrike502
      link
      32 years ago

      The expansion of bases around the world for example has been used to cement dollar hegemony

      Precisely. And how much do you think they want to maintain that hegemony?

      • @knfrmity
        link
        42 years ago

        In my understanding of superimperialism and dollar hegemony it’s not so much that American capitalists and government want to maintain it (although they do as it’s an institution of their power), but that they must maintain dollar hegemony as a matter of survival. If they don’t, the entire house of cards falls and the bulk of the USA’s $20T+ in debt comes due.

        • @Shrike502
          link
          22 years ago

          And how far do you think they’ll be willing to go to avoid it?

          • @knfrmity
            link
            22 years ago

            Since it’s a basic question of existence, no effort will be spared to secure that existence.

            • @Shrike502
              link
              32 years ago

              Ergo the “paper bully” is going to start flinging nukes