In light of user Wisconcom’s community Hoxhaism (created using an alternate account named Ouisconkom), and the anti-China/anti-Mao sectarianism that permeates the rhetoric of the community. It has come to our attention that some members of the community are unhappy with this sort of content being allowed.
In the past, we’ve removed other Ultra-leftists, such as Patriotic Socialists, for their sectarianism. And some of the admins feel this might be a time to do that again.
Lemmygrad’s success depends on transparency and communication between the user base and the admins, so we would like the Lemmygrad community to tell us how they feel about this possible issue.
I think what you said here is the crux of it.
Is it possible for Hoxhaism to actually do that? If you take away the criticism of China and the USSR, it’s just Stalinism. It doesn’t add anything to the ideological discussion except criticism of other forms of Marxism. Therefore there’s a case to be made that a dedicated Hoxhaist community doesn’t offer anything to the Lemmygrad community other than divisive invective.
That is false, Hoxhaism is not just “Stalinism”. It has unique theoretical content.
碉堡爱好者
deleted by creator
This is one of purposes of the Hoxhaist community here - to fight against the common misconceptions about Hoxhaism. While Enver Hoxha’s investment into fortifications was warranted, it is not the ideological content of Hoxhaism.
毛泽东说“要把朋友搞得多多的，把敌人搞的少少的”然而全世界一番光明伟大正义，唯一的真正马克思主义者，全欧洲的明灯霍查同志宁愿将南斯拉夫苏联中国设立为自己的敌人，并且颅内臆想苏联和南斯拉夫要侵略自己，在阿尔巴尼亚建造数十万个堡垒而不愿用这些材料建造住宅分给人民
deleted by creator