source

If you don’t see what i’m referring to, it’s just the usual stuff :

More here, here, and a bit of debunking there

    • sous-merdeBannedOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If i meant that only one side uses (atrocity/war/… )propagaganda. It was admittedly a very poor choice of words on my part.

        • aelwero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Only one side of anything being propagandised is effectively a non-existent concept. Propaganda is simply promotion of an opposing idea. People tend to equate the term with outright lies, but propaganda is far more often truth that’s specifically chosen to influence opinions in a certain direction.

          The very notion of “only one side” propagandising is, in and of itself, propaganda (and in my opinion, a very common form of it, one you’ll find much more egregiously used in US politics). I was simply pointing out the irony without meaning any implications to either side.

        • sous-merdeBannedOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          haha, he was asking if i meant that only one side uses (atrocity/war/… )propagaganda