An interesting little history by Wayne R. Dynes, which briefly goes over several writers throughout history promoting this misconception. Sample:

The scholastic theologian Albertus Magnus (d. 1280) held that the vice of sodomy was “more common in persons of high station than in humble persons.” This impression reflects in part the greater visibility of the doings of the privileged, and also the fact that, through their status or influence, the nobility could frequently escape with a reprimand for the commission of crimes which were subject to capital punishment when committed by commoners. This aspect of class justice has fueled social envy, leading to the demand on the part of the straitlaced middle class that the aristocracy be disciplined and required, for its part, to adhere to the narrow canons of petty bourgeois morality.

  • Anarcho-BolshevikOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sorry, I should have been clearer in my message. What I quoted was just a particularly interesting paragraph from this (short) PDF, which named several other takes on the matter throughout recorded history. I wasn’t trying to make a case that homosexuality somehow has a higher incidence in one class over another.