What’s something low profile comrades say that communicate immediately that they know which side they fight for in the class struggle?

Example: if anyone in the wild speaks “material conditions”, or “bourgeois state”, out loud, I’m listening.

  • Ronin_5
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because I feel like he’s just a Chinese nationalist. He hasn’t referenced any theory or performed any class analysis. He just recites taking points like “landlord bad”.

    • vermingot@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have a friend who’s kinda like that, he says he’s communist but also says that freelancers are bourgeois because “they don’t need to exploit the proletariat to be the dominant class” ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • QueerCommie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      A larper’s better than an anticommunist. Just talk about and share theory and he might become a real comrade.

      • Ronin_5
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree, but the entire situation is hilarious because he thinks I’m a liberal bourge.

        • QueerCommie
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why don’t you just come out and say you’re a commie?

          • Ronin_5
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            This guy flipped PS5’s while holding a six figure salary at a trust fund, managing marketing.

            Like no ethical consumerism under capitalism and all but that’s a little excessive.

            • QueerCommie
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Wow. Would it be feasible in the foreseeable future to get him to use some of that on helping organizations and praxis?