• acabjones
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kim Stanley Robinson is an ML? After reading Ministry for the Future I assumed he was a socdem. I did not like that book. It’s been a while since I read it, and from what I remember, it omitted a useful economic analysis and liberation struggle from confronting climate crisis which seemed totally idealistic to me.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆M
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recall reading that he considered himself a Marxist, and he does appear to support revolutionary approach to social change in his books. While Ministry for the Future isn’t perfect, it did some economic analysis showing that capitalism is fundamentally at odds with having a livable future. The whole thesis of the book is that capitalism needs to be abolished, and the book also doesn’t shy away from saying that violence will be necessary to do so. It also talks positively about USSR saying that it had the right idea all along.

      • acabjones
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair enough, for some reason I really recall raging at that book being unrealistic in a “let’s vote away climate crisis” kind of way, but I also don’t remember details 😂. Thanks.

      • Bloops
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s a socialist, but not a Marxist-Leninist. Not instinctively hating the USSR is good, but it doesn’t make you an ML. 😛

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆M
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fair, I do find his open support for revolutionary struggle refreshing though.