I disagree about the nuke thing. Nukes are too traceable, it’s too brinksmanship-like with Russia and risks nuclear retaliation even if on a limited scale. Far more likely is they false flag with biological or chemical weapons. Those are almost impossible to trace and just as outrageous. Just whip up some novichuk or similar, drop it on one of those areas, scream bloody murder that the Russians did it and there you go, got your NATO involvement under another name.
They’ve been hinting at it for some time now. The previous misinformation about the Russians imminently going to use such things. The new conditions for intervention. It doesn’t even have to be a political decision the Pentagon or Executive makes. The CIA sees this and they’ll just go for it on their own because they were told in other words the price of involvement is that.
I disagree about the nuke thing. Nukes are too traceable, it’s too brinksmanship-like with Russia and risks nuclear retaliation even if on a limited scale. Far more likely is they false flag with biological or chemical weapons. Those are almost impossible to trace and just as outrageous. Just whip up some novichuk or similar, drop it on one of those areas, scream bloody murder that the Russians did it and there you go, got your NATO involvement under another name.
They’ve been hinting at it for some time now. The previous misinformation about the Russians imminently going to use such things. The new conditions for intervention. It doesn’t even have to be a political decision the Pentagon or Executive makes. The CIA sees this and they’ll just go for it on their own because they were told in other words the price of involvement is that.