Following the news that Lemmy world has decided to defederate from hexbear without consulting their community and before hexbear even federated with anyone, I’d like to make this announcement to settle things once and for all about us “scary tankies” who apparently don’t tolerate free expression or whatever.

Lemmygrad has been around since the very beginning of Lemmy as a project, we are one of the oldest instance with lemmy.ml.

In that time, we have never defederated from anyone except in three cases:

  • troll instances (usually inactive and unmoderated, with free account requests, that trolls used back in the day to bypass their bans). We usually refederate if they start being moderated again.
  • outright fascist instances such as exploding heads or powerballs or whatever before the admin deleted it (which you’re welcome, it’s because there’s communists on Lemmy that there’s so few fascists)
  • and, the fringe case, the couple specifically NSFW instances that we instantly defederated from because we don’t want to host porn on our database and our rule 5 prohibits porn anywhere on Lemmygrad.

Otherwise, we have no reason to defederate from anyone. Holier-than-thou liberals can be difficult and irritating, I’m not denying that or implying we’re somehow above it all, but to defederate would imply we are scared of what they have to say. We’re not, because what they have to say is stuff we’ve all seen for ourselves and used to believe too.

You can see our blocklist here for yourself: https://lemmygrad.ml/instances, we only block around 40 instances, which might seem like a lot, but then compare to lemmy world which blocks 141 instances, or beehaw which blocks 765 instances.

Nobody is born a communist. Nobody is born a liberal either, but we become one through the self-reproduction of culture. From our earliest age we’re exposed to liberalism (the ideology of capitalism) to the point that we integrate it. Did you have a model UN in school and vote for class presidents?

So really we can’t be scared of anti-communist arguments because we’ve heard them all before. It’s especially weird when people say we “buy into old propaganda” around Stalin or whatever, when anywhere you look, Soviet historiography in academia amounts to little more than “Stalin was paranoid and acted like the Tsar but called himself a communist”. Like we went to public school too lol, we had a unit on the USSR lol.

Anyway, all defederations that happened on Lemmygrad come from other instances themselves, most of them pre-emptively defederating us before they even saw a single post from us. If beehaw, or shitjustworks, or lemmy dot whatever wanted to refederate, they could do it instantly and we’d be federated again.

And on that topic, let’s talk about bans. We don’t ban people who ask questions in good faith. But we will instantly ban anyone who comes to Lemmygrad solely to troll, as all online forums have done since time immemorial.

Likewise on blocklist issues, we poll our community very often for their input and allow them to propose changes. You can look at our !lemmygrad_court@lemmygrad.ml to see some things we’ve included the community on. We try to practice democratic centralism where applicable.

It goes even further; we allow communities and posts that some both on Lemmygrad or outside might disagree with, on the principle that we see ourselves as a more generalistic ML instance. We allow users to have their own community and moderate it however they want (respecting sitewide rules), and generally the removal of a community goes through an admin chat and might even go to a community feedback session. We have meme communities, we have religious communities, we have shitposting communities, and we also have serious discussion communities. And a plethora of personal communities for users who want to post in their own space like a blog.

We also have exactly 6 rules and no lengthy code of conduct or other documents one needs to read to participate here. This is helped by the fact that as we’re all communists and more specifically mainly marxist-leninists, most of us already behave the expected way around comrades and don’t need to be told how to conduct themselves.

So let me ask this; who is really censoring who here?

  • alunyanneгs 🏳️‍⚧️♀️
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    very interesting how the “i hate nazis but they are still human and deserve to have a voice” crowd and the free speech absolutists never cover it for commies 🤔

    • MarxMadness
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      11 months ago

      Outside of a small, small group of true free speech absolutists, the liberal ideal of free speech has never been sincere. Even the ACLU purged communists from its ranks.

      • alunyanneгs 🏳️‍⚧️♀️
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah at this point I’m convinced that “free speech” is nothing more than a thinly-veiled dogwhistle for “how dare you not let us openly spew hateful diatribe”. I can’t help but to just roll my eyes whenever someone even mentions this.

        • MarxMadness
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s a book you might like on the topic: The Case Against Free Speech.

          Hate the title, though, because it’s immediately undercut by the introduction, where the author says he’s more deconstructing the idea that free speech exists rather than opposing the concept itself. Might even say the title was a publisher decision to be intentionally provocative, but I can’t remember exactly.

      • redtea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Those absolutists are unfortunately quite loud and already in the fediverse (content warning: CSA): https://lemmygrad.ml/post/1084499

        CW: CSA

        If you follow that link (I can’t recommend it) there’s even someone complaining of the response that ‘other’ ‘people’ get when they ‘defend non-offending pedos’. Then they add nuance to explain what that means and guess what – they end up defending pedos! You couldn’t make it up. But apparently there’s a large crowd who fell for or who supports the rhetoric.

        So really, they’re upset about being called out for shit views. All this in the context of more ‘adding nuance’ to say that Aaron Schwartz wasn’t a bad guy for arguing against punishment of child porn offences on grounds of free speech. (Just to be clear: I’m saying there is no defence of CP/CSA on any grounds, not just ‘free speech’.) That comment got 45 upvotes (versus 8 downvotes) so far and the rest of the discussion isn’t much / any better.

        I’d be curious to see the overlap between the (CP) absolutists and the decision to defederate from Hexbear.

        I suspect there’s a strong overlap even between those who (contradictorily) argue for free speech absolutism and those who think it’s okay to censor left-speech. Even the absolutists (often) don’t think harmful speech should be shared; they’re just (or they think they are) very good at recategorising harm to suggest that harmful speech isn’t harmful. Leftists are not afforded this innovative courtesy of re-framing, though.