I really cannot stress enough how little I want that to happen right now. I’m extremely grateful that NATO exists and is strengthening. I have a fear that it’s not strong enough yet to face everything that might be coming.
Now, if we ever end up in such a happy situation where it’s not actually needed anymore, then sure, bring it down. Personally, I regard even 0.1% GDP military spending a gross violation against humanity. Like Yuval Harari recently said in an interview, every cent of that money is away from some more important problems like healthcare, education and fighting the climate change. But when the alternative is slavery in a totalitarian state then we must do that gross violation then.
This all should very well should be added to the long list of crimes against humanity that Putin is growing. But of course he will never be prosecuted. They never are.
I love how you managed to forget all the crimes against humanity that NATO is responsible for while writing all that drivel. Liberals consistently expose themselves as having utter lack of intellectual integrity.
I’m very curious to know how you arrived at that based on what I wrote. Where do I imply that I want children to be at war?
What I was pointing out is that NATO has killed, and continues to kill far more children than Russia has. So, if we’re worried about wellbeing of children then NATO is a net negative in that regard. NATO is participating in a literal genocide in Yemen as we speak starving children to death. I guess all the ghouls here cheering NATO don’t care about those kids since they don’t have blue eyes and blond hair though.
Whataboutism is a form of the tu quoque fallacy where a double standard is used to dismiss criticisms of one’s own behavior in order to focus instead on the actions of another. People who cry whataboutism engage in empty and cynical deflection of responsibility. You’re a pseudo intellectual troll.
If you’re going to try to use big words then at least learn what they mean. Ad hominem would be if I claimed that your argument was wrong because you’re a piece of shit. I’m pointing out that your argument is wrong and you’re a piece of shit.
That was obviously never going to happen, although one can wish that the biggest imperialist military organization would disband.
I really cannot stress enough how little I want that to happen right now. I’m extremely grateful that NATO exists and is strengthening. I have a fear that it’s not strong enough yet to face everything that might be coming.
Now, if we ever end up in such a happy situation where it’s not actually needed anymore, then sure, bring it down. Personally, I regard even 0.1% GDP military spending a gross violation against humanity. Like Yuval Harari recently said in an interview, every cent of that money is away from some more important problems like healthcare, education and fighting the climate change. But when the alternative is slavery in a totalitarian state then we must do that gross violation then.
This all should very well should be added to the long list of crimes against humanity that Putin is growing. But of course he will never be prosecuted. They never are.
I love how you managed to forget all the crimes against humanity that NATO is responsible for while writing all that drivel. Liberals consistently expose themselves as having utter lack of intellectual integrity.
Having my children threatened by war does wonders to previous viewpoints, yes. It brings the theoretical wankery down a notch or two.
May all children live happily in peace
What makes your children more important than millions of children NATO murdered?
Liberal galaxy brain logic: pointing out that lives of the children NATO massacres are as important as other children is a personal attack.
reported : personal attack targeted at their children
Liberal galaxy brain logic: pointing out that lives of the children NATO massacres are as important as other children is a personal attack.
Worst thing in your comment is you want (do you?) your children at war.
I’m very curious to know how you arrived at that based on what I wrote. Where do I imply that I want children to be at war?
What I was pointing out is that NATO has killed, and continues to kill far more children than Russia has. So, if we’re worried about wellbeing of children then NATO is a net negative in that regard. NATO is participating in a literal genocide in Yemen as we speak starving children to death. I guess all the ghouls here cheering NATO don’t care about those kids since they don’t have blue eyes and blond hair though.
Chronic whataboutism!
Whataboutism is a form of the tu quoque fallacy where a double standard is used to dismiss criticisms of one’s own behavior in order to focus instead on the actions of another. People who cry whataboutism engage in empty and cynical deflection of responsibility. You’re a pseudo intellectual troll.
Explain now what the Ad Hominem logical fallacy is, please.
If you’re going to try to use big words then at least learn what they mean. Ad hominem would be if I claimed that your argument was wrong because you’re a piece of shit. I’m pointing out that your argument is wrong and you’re a piece of shit.
i was going to say this, but his … so revulsing, i can’t describe.
Thanks for encouraging me and others to stay in here.
Please die, liberal.
Thank you for this compliment :) And then bye bye plonk.
Please, nazi, take off your mask, we all know what liberal’s true intentions are.
Removed by mod
I wish they would go away, I can’t stand them and their delusions of grandeur.
Removed by mod