Of course most mod deleted comments (that got archived on Pushshift) are talking with (some) sense e.g.:
The idea that the poorly supplied Russians are deliberately seeking to produce war crimes by expending valuable munition on harmless targets is so ridiculous. Yet that seems to be the narrative people are going with. The shelling serves a military purpose. —
Civilians are unfortunately collateral damage.
There should be no veto rights. —
That way Israel and Saudi Arabia wouldn’t be able to terrorize the Middle East much longer, either, and countries like Russia, China and India could start taking action against the US more effectively.
the ukrainian government is giving weapons to civilians and making militias —
militias/armies have to be identifiable with uniforms to let the enemy combatants know the difference between civilians and standing militias —
and bombing dorms isn’t a war crime 😂 —
as long as you broadcast in advance that you’re shelling it (which russia does) russia is playing on the radio frequencies nonstop to leave the cities they’re shelling —
if you bomb a country you drop pamphlets before you bomb them which negates it being a war crime
This is zelensky wants to happen by capturing foriegn students as hostage and let russia kill them on cross fire and let the world be furious agaonst russia…sneaky son of removed
Ooh are they banning people for calling bullshit on this like they like to do?
https://www.unddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/t6eyp9/4_chinese_students_1_indian_killed_by_russian/
Of course most mod deleted comments (that got archived on Pushshift) are talking with (some) sense e.g.: