I am asking the world to delete Meta apps. Please.
I have already done as you ask!
rooted device? If not… No its not uninstalled
my last android didn’t have it preinstalled
Which one was that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Android_smartphones
Which carrier?
The freedom of Android means that there are tens of thousands of variations of devices / os versions / carriers all with different states of being close or far to vanilla and being more or less locked down. There’s a reason Graphene only officially supports Pixels.
want my social security number while we’re at it?
one of them.
Neither did mine… But it’s got Google all up in it.
yes well google makes android, facebook owns whatsapp….
if you want to fully degoogle your android you have to root it and install a different ROM….
nothing to do with whatsapp thoughRight, I was just saying I’ve never had meta on here. And id like to get rid of Google too but… Pixel 9 😅
Pixels are the best phones to change ROMs (it’s peculiar but it’s true). Take a look at GrapheneOS. I’m running it on a Pixel 7 Pro and all my apps work.
i mean, Android is made by google….
but i think the pixel is particularly well supported by 3rd party roms…
seems doable: https://xdaforums.com/f/google-pixel-9.12879/
banking apps and some others don’t like if your phone is rooted though…
I’m not just talking about the apps that can be accessed via the launcher. But also other services/modules that cannot be accessed via the launcher.
well a claim like that deserves a source
Stuff like this as example (well not the 2 Last entrys)Oh yes, of course, if you want to completely prevent communication to Meta with a customized host file, you can’t avoid root or a solution that then sets up a local VPN so that it can be blocked, but then no other vpn is functional.
Meta services is a dependency for fb messanger. But can be uninstalled with adb or canta
Lol there was…
iOS. Commence the hate bombs.
Haha. Well, I can criticize Apple for a lot of things, but Alphabet with Android as well. Especially with Apple, I don’t know what is pre-installed and how deeply anchored in the system. With Android, I would also prefer to be able to remove all the bloatware without root.
I am actually very confident that Apple is selling what is almost certainly an enormous amount of my PHI to minimal buyers, if any. That’s not where they make their money, and they have no interest in it, and one of their main selling points is that they don’t do it.
Now, over the years, Apple has enshittified to an increasingly maddening degree, however—having worked at the Apple Store for five years some time ago—I can say that I think at the core of the company, it’s just not quite as evil in these terms as, say, Meta and Google. I think it’s a pretty informed, educated opinion to have. I know that many people disagree, especially in this community. And that’s fair.
I would actually be all about setting up my own ecosystem for smart home and sync and media library with Linux if it weren’t so frigging much work and so difficult that, honestly, it would take me forever and I probably would not achieve success. So, as objectively bad as the Apple ecosystem has become, it is sadly the best alternative out there, in my humble opinion.
Well, in the end, everyone has to decide what they are happier with anyway. Even though I use Linux, I can understand that people also prefer to work seamlessly in the Apple Ecosystem. I can’t comment on the smart home. I don’t have any problems there, but I build my own things that the average user might not be interested in.
Indeed, the “evilness” of apple is really directed more frontally at app developers. That’s their cash cow.
And now they apparently treat their own develops like shit. At least, according to an article I just read. There’s a lot to get angry about with them, for sure. It was NOT like this back in 2007.
What? Your phone came with Facebook in the system image?
Naturally. After all, Meta pays the manufacturers to integrate and pre-install their stuff. As I said, this includes not only the apps you see in the launcher but also the services for integration in other apps, etc. If you really think Meta would do without such a treasure trove of data, you’re being naive.
What do you have? Samsung?
Xiaomi (but i got other Brands too). With hyperOS (Android based) < because of the previous history with the trade dispute over Huawei. Nevertheless, even there you will find various apk’s from Meta that are integrated into the system.
That’s a bit extreme to worry about. If the app is disabled and has no permissions, it can’t run or share your data with Meta. It’s just sitting there wasting storage space.
My Meta account got locked without explanation and support couldnt tell me why, but suspiciously right after they implemented their new policies allowing hate speech but also I had deleted all of my posts going back to 2006 not long before that and had only been using it fir groups, so it wasn’t as big of an impact so wasn’t worth suing them to find out why I was locked out exactly or to start a new account.
deleted by creator
Currently trying to delete WhatsApp and people I know are giving me a hard time…
We unfortunately have a school group chat on Instagram, so maybe in 2 years. And we also have family group chat on WhatsApp.
I can’t believe i agree with iran.
what’s unbelievable about it
Authoritarian Islamic fundamentalism.
As opposed to western “Divine Secular Absolutism”? Real funny looking words you got there, when stringed together.
Authoritarianism is a dumb, useless and meaningless term, when you understand that every state assumes authority (name me one country that doesn’t assume authority, therefore isn’t “authoritarian”).
1979 happened because you libs couldn’t stop trying to meddle in Iran’s affairs.
Coulda saved spared us from the dogwhistle by just saying “they’re not white”.
Authoritarian as in not allowing westerners to take over the country resources.
insert burger index goodness report here
No, Authoritarian as in not allowing women to have basic human rights.
This is why I don’t like tankies. You claim to be leftist but always support countries with right-wing policies. Lemmygrad has turned your brain to mush.
There are thousands of videos of foreigneirs strolling in Iran where you can see women walking around freely, the narrative youre spewing is a stupid propaganda point to justify a bloody war with Iran.
There is no such thing as a “leftist” that supports a bloody invasion to “liberate women”.
Noooooo Karl Marx would absolutely support capitalist dropping nuclear bombs on Iranian children
God damn, and here I thought Americans were brainwashed. How are you completely unaware of the protests and uncovered women being kidnapped by government officials? I refuse to believe that someone can be this ignorant of world events. They’re walking around uncovered because they’re protesting the hijab mandate, you fucking donkey. But it’s still a law, designed to oppress women.
But of course you’re already aware of this, so I don’t know why I’m bothering. Nobody can be this ignorant. You’re obviously trolling.
tankies
Mom, I said it again
Imagine trying to explain the concept of authority like a dipshit and then end it with an accusation of racism.
Could never be me lmao.
I can imagine, because it’s almost always true of chronically Western libs parroting State Department buzzwords. Not really beating the allegations here.
Name one country that doesn’t assume authority.
The “humanitarian”, “right 2 protect” intervention propaganda bs is dead and buried after Gaza. Nobody loves religious extremists more than the USA, both domestically and internationally. The primary western whataboutist complain about adversaries is some “freedom of religion” crap, usually because the US is secretly funding literal jihadi butcher separatists to destabilize sovereign nations. It’s always the most rabid extremists, religiously and politically that end up working for the US and then bite the hand that fed them by becoming Al Qaeda and ISIS.
Crickets about the Uyghur jihadis showing up as Al Qaeda forces in now “liberated” shariah law Syria. Crickets about Syria in general. Constant whining about a mostly secular state with far more rights than now, then sponsoring fanatics that curtail all these rights and go about chopping people’s heads off in the street but not a word now because Syria aligns itself with the West, not because it’s more democratic. Tons of whining about Iran instead of the head chopping Syrian jihadis type of “philanthropy”.
Why are the jihadis around? Because the USA has already outlawed all the secular (usually communist) organizations in the Middle East for decades and declared them terrorists. Nobody hates secular organizations in the Middle East, Asia and Africa more than the USA because they’re the least likely to become collaborators.
We can go on to the secondary whataboutist canard that involves doubting the democratic nature of foreign governments (whenever they’re able to resist getting toppled by the CIA boys somehow). This has become just refusing to accept election results by default even when international observers are present and don’t find any irregularities like in Venezuela. Elections that bring up some ultra right nutjob that loves Murica and turns his country to a neoliberal banana republic like Milei are always legitimate, but when Chaves and Maduro win they’re always illegitimate for no reason other than not serving US interests. The US State Department main job is just lying all day long.
We should just bring up this matter to the UN after abolishing the undemocratic security council and the veto right that the USA has abused to continue genocides. Based on the American narrative both Republicans and Democrats accuse each other of stealing and rigging elections so at least one side must be correct. The US is infamous for gerrymandering and artificially preventing minorities from voting anyway (that didn’t even have the right to vote until the 60s, imagine the level of hypocrisy it takes for the US apartheid to wag the finger towards anyone about elections). So maybe it should be invaded by every UN member to restore democracy since the US loves both democracy and invasions to restore it so much.
In fact I bet that plenty of Americans would actually fully welcome an invading force if its only goal would be to abolish the federal government and let them all vote for local fully sovereign governments instead. So maybe circulating this idea might come back to bite interventionists sooner than later.
Awww, you’ve been reading newspapers again.
oh honey
why do you think it’s that way
the new york times told me so i repeat every chance i get.
I’m well aware that the British and US lead a coup to reinstall the Shah, which ultimately caused the Iranian Revolution. Islamic fundamentalism was definitely not the answer.
You sure have a lot of fucking attitude for someone criticizing people for not being your slaves. Pretty crazy you have the fucking nerve to criticize in the first place. Almost like you think they should have stayed your slaves and that would have been better.
It has been their answer because a ideologically strong and intolerant leadership is what you need when foreign power are invading your politics and coup-ing your governments.
You don’t want to end up geopolitically cucked like Ethiopia or India or China. So you install brutal monster who put people repeating foreign power talking points, into an industrial blender.
Anyone who thinks that’s not great, great! Stop doing to the coup shit. Find a CIA mind slave and explain why the oxygen they’re breathing could feed some african child.
Removed by mod
“We do not collect your precise location”.
So… just like, to the nearest 10 metres then?
“We do not provide bulk information to any government”
So, only on the most important politicians and nuclear scientists?
“Just the people they’re interested in”
“We do not provide bulk information to any government.”
Millions of dollars on the other hand…
Everyone should delete these spyware tools from their devices.
deleted by creator
Zucc himself is a zio, they don’t even need to infiltrate that one.
(Somewhat unrelated to the subject, but I felt like writing my thoughts on Iran in general.)
Iran being a Shia theocracy seems repressive and backwards to us, and surely they are as theocracies tend to be. This means that thinking about Iran westerners tend to think they themselves are on the good side, while Iran is on the bad side. But this is fundamentally wrong and the west is clearly the bad actor, given that it does not have any legitimate interests in the area and only engaged for imperialistic reasons.
If you look at Iran’s history you’ll learn that the Islamic Revolution of Iran was a response to western influences, and those western influences came along with the 1953 coup d’etat. And this coup d’état was supported by the US & UK. And the only reason this was done was for the purpose of oil. It was in reaction to Iran trying to nationalize it’s oil industry, which obviously was a good idea, but bad for the western imperialists. So you install a puppet regime, that begs for a revolution, and surprise surpise, there’s a revolution and it happens to be religious and conservative. So ever since the people of Iran have been stuck with it’s theocracy, Undeniably this is in part the fault of the West.
Then of course there is the anti-Israel stance of Iran, which is constantly used as proof of Iran being evil. But if just for a second you try to look at Israel from the perspective of someone from the Middle East, you’ll see that Israel is a colonial state, founded by zionists who from the very start commited ethnic cleansing to secure their state. The Nakba isn’t talked about much in the west, but just try to imagine a similar event happening in your region of the world by foreign powers, and you’ll understand the impact that would have. That is not forgotten after a few decades, especially because Israel is still driving people from their lands and colonizing it till this very day. This isn’t ancient history, this is in the present. They even returned to committing genocide all over again. Also, Israel has been the base for the US influence in the region and all the wars and interventions that come with that. How can you possibly expect Iran to not view Israel as their mortal enemy? Just imagine a Middle Eastern colonial state located in Europe or the US, created by ethnic cleansing the local population. We’d view that state as a mortal enemy and want to drive these people of our lands. I am not saying this is the proper thing to do, I am saying it’s obvious that this sentiment is broadly shared. It’s hardly surprising. Victims tend to have harsh views of those who attacked them.
And Iran is being attacked again, supposedly for developing nuclear weapons. Meanwhile Israel has had nuclear weapons since the 60s. But in the views of westerners this is not a problem, because Israel is good, being a democracy and all that, while Iran is bad, being a theocracy. But these are all just western frames. Why in the world would a bomb be in safe hands with a hyperagressive colonial ethnostate that has repeatedly engaged in ethnic cleanings? But not in the hands of an admittedly backwards, conservative theocracy, that wants to secure itself from western imperialism. The Iranian interest in having a bomb seems completely reasonable actually. Again, just imagine a Middle Eastern colonial hyperagressive ethnostate founded by the ethnic cleansing of your local communities. And now they have nuclear bombs. And not only that, Middle Easterns powers are constantly engaging in wars all across your region. Would it be unreasonable for you to also want a nuclear bomb in such a situation? It’s a no brainer.
And as much as I dislike theocracies, I can’t help but think that if the west wasn’t as imperialist as we have been and still are, Iran would’ve developed into something completely different. Iran/Persia has always been the center of regional powers, from the Achaemenids 500 bc till today. It’s a beautiful country, they have a beautiful and rich history and they have an incredible culture, from the Islamic geometry, to the persian miniatures, to the incredible Sufi poets. You can’t expect a proud people as they are to lie back and be dominated by western imperialism. And the more you repress people, the more they’re bound to turn to theocractic conservatist populism.
TL:DR we’re not the good guys, Iran are not the bad guys.
The world needs to move to digital sovereignty. It’s amazing to think that a country like Iran, that is constantly under threat of the US, has so many people using Whatsapp, and probably relying on much more US software.
deleted by creator
Now when you say “asks”…
deleted by creator
Iran isn’t needed to know that WhatsApp and meta is bad.
Imperialist outlet Independent privacy washing surveillance messager Meta Whatsapp. They are platforming might - that is Meta Whatsapp spokesperson - instead of privacy focused organizations such as Electronic Frontier Foundation. Painting Iran as paranoid after litterally being attacked by zioni supremacist ruledom.
Now let’s be clear. Morality police is bad. Women Life Freedom. They are suppressing humanity. But this work is made to embolden Israel and western might.
Side with folks instead. We need to enblossom the folks at ground so that they can become independent of might.
hit the gym, get a divorce
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
when ideology is so internalized that you end up in the side of propietary spyware as whatsapp.
moderated by deletor
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
