I’m in a dilemma, I think ownership of media is important, but the convenience of Spotify and the algorithm of new music that it suggests has helped me find amazing artists that I wouldn’t have heard of otherwise.

Fellow sailors, what are your thoughts, and how do you personally listen to music?

  • twistedtxb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe its a generational thing but I prefer having a Plex / Plexamp serveur with all my music as FLAC on my home server. I can better curate my collection and it’s available everywhere.

  • small44@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Local library. I don’t want to pay for things I don’t own. Streaming services also can remove/ disable music any time. I also don’t need recommendation algorithms I think they are biased. I can easily discover new artists on blogs

  • GrishAix@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with OP that it is best to have DRM free files. For music recommendations, I use a Scrobber plugin for Last.fm.

  • authenyo@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mixing and matching is the best option, mostly.

    I like to have my personal favorite albums and non-streaming albums in my drive, but if i download something new, most of the time it will just stay there and i’ll never listen to it.

    Streaming is wayyy better for discovering music (and also not making your hard drive full). If for every album you want to listen to you need to download, it sometimes lets you out of great music because of simple lazyness lol

  • unnecessaryNecessity@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use streaming for music these days. For one, I’m able to get either cheap or free premium services via some tricks (Apple Music currently has an exploitable, constant free trial through Shazam). I’d still consider paying for a service, though, if I had to.

    For me, I consume music much differently than other media. For shows, movies, and literature, I typically only watch or read something once ever, at the most once every year. This means I don’t feel the need to retain or backup most things. I still keep what I acquire while I have space on my NAS, but there are no backups and if I ever need to free up space, I know the first volume to clean up.

    Music I constantly listen to over and over. If I go through the effort of acquiring something, I’ll need to make sure the metadata is consistent. When I had my old collection, I’d have to make sure it was backed up to cloud storage because I couldn’t risk losing all that music I had found and curated. I found I was approaching the point where my monthly costs of backing up to Glacier-like services was beginning to approach the monthly cost of streaming. Plus, despite some of the discovery algorithms being terrible, it’s still been a useful tool for discovering new music. I’m also able to take streaming on the go, I cannot take the entire library I curated. I’m not someone who knows ahead of time what I’ll want to listen to.

    I suppose this was all a long-winded way to say the cost-benefit analysis no longer made sense for keeping local music files for me. Part of it is streaming music services roughly have everything I want to listen to. I don’t need to subscribe to 5 different services like video platforms. Music streaming services, at least now, mostly understand that they need to be more convenient that pirating.

  • Headbangerd17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used my local library for most of my life. Grew up with crappy internet so that necessitated downloading everything to make sure I got no hiccups when it finally came time to listen. Since starting work I began using Spotify (as a way to take all my music with me, had no alternative at the time) and continue to alternate between both. Streaming is nice and all but dependent on internet and given my experience, it’s better to have a local library. It’s just more reliable. Spotify’s great for music discovery though and has made my local library grown significantly.

  • Leraje@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have Ampache running on a self hosted server, which has desktop and mobile apps.

    • techgearwhips@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know why you were down voted but thanks for this. I’m doing some research on it now. So here take this upvote

  • notun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Support your favourite artists by buying their merchandise and going to shows.

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Local copy for life. Streaming is just renting by a nicer name. I don’t want to pay for the rest of my life to access the same content. I’ll buy CDs and I’ll buy DRM-free FLAC files if available, but otherwise I’m pirating the FLAC copy or, if worst comes to worst, ripping the audio from YouTube (too many new artists/YT artists don’t offer lossless downloads). I’m not paying for something I don’t get to keep.

  • FreeThinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have tens of thousands of songs in my home computer but I prefer to just use Spotify when I am outside.

  • 0xCAFe@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Local library for me for sure!

    I discover new music through friends, Shazam, and browsing Youtube Music.

    With ~6k songs I don’t get bored that fast.