• Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no election in sight, this is prime time to criticize the DNC. Anyone trying to shut down discussion right now is the biggest loser DNC shill you can imagine.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s like we don’t even have a direction anymore. Vote to stop the trump agenda? He has all three branches, if there is anything locking up congress will do it will be fringe. They run on not passing legislation. Stop a trump third term, sorry he’s not allowed a third term and if he’s running for one I don’t imagine the DNC can do much to stop it because major fuckery is going down.

        Ok well maybe it’s not all about trump. Alright, what is is about? Maintaining the status quo and never implementing any change?

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember the hundreds of memes about how it was fine to do it except 3 months 6 weeks a month 17 days 96 hours before an election.

      Turns out 4 years and a month is a little late to talk about the as yet undecided DNC leadership.

  • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t forget being called a tankie for daring to rightfully criticize the democrats for being the frauds they are.

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, meanwhile the only actual tankies are the ones who cheerlead the USSR and PRC.

        As an anti authoritarian, while I can see some redeeming qualities in those countries, overall I’m not a fan. Though I do love me some propaganda art from the time.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be clear, the vast majority of Marxists support the PRC and USSR. The only major exceptions are Trots, who are mostly found in the Western Left due to their anti-AES slant aligning with the overall liberal Western hegemony, and small pockets in South America. Trots have produced no successful revolutions, so they pose little threat. Though I do think it’s funny that Trots love newspapers.

          As for “anti-authoritarian,” I’m not really sure what that means unless you are either an Anarchist or have an arbitrary level of government you deem unacceptable.

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Anarchist. I lean somewhere between anarcho communist and libertarian socialist. In the most basic sense, I’m suspicious of power because I believe power corrupts and no system of economics or government is immune to this.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Can you elaborate? Moreover, can you explain why you believe Anarchism to be better at solving this percieved problem?

                  Corruption exists in all systems, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be fought against. Letting perfect utopia be the enemy of massive progress is fatal. Even in an Anarchist system, there can and would be differences in power and access to resources, only without a spread of power across the system.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      Leading up to the election? Very reasonable. The Democrats are frauds, but they’re not as bad for the left as Republicans. It’s in our best interest to big tent with them for damage mitigation, to prevent the fascists from gaining power. Criticism, however deserved, helps the fascists.

      After the election? Have at 'em. They’re not as terrible as the Republicans, but they’re awful nonetheless.

      • Red5
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Big tent” with people who will give you nothing for your vote. There is a slight chance that they will not take as much away or maybe just not as fast, but they won’t make any meaningful changes.

      • MeowZedong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Since when did fascists need an election to gain power and whose support gave them that power?

        What you really got there is a big old tent of fucking fascists collaborators, which means from a practical standpoint, you’ve got a big tent full of fucking fascists. Those criticisms are the calls warning you that they will do nothing to stop the rise of fascism and, worse yet, are actively aiding its rise by stamping out any competition to their rule that will show strong opposition to fascism. These are warning calls that echo the realities of our history and you should heed them! Germany is not the only example mirroring this path.

        If you really want to dig a bit deeper into motivations, the Democrats will and have always supported right wingers over the left because they have more in common with the fascists than actual leftist movements. They are far more threatening than the Republicans simply in that they pretend they aren’t also right-wing and swindle people into acting against their own class interests.

        People see the fascist without the mask, but it’s much harder for them to recognize the monster when it instead smiles at them and removes the mask slowly.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Having a big tent isn’t winning the election. They need to be offering seats at the table.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Big tents absolutely win elections, that’s really the only thing that does. Seats at the table are incentives to get people in the tent. But if they don’t get the votes , they don’t get the table, and any seats they offer are worthless.

          You put me in a room with Democratic party leadership, and I’ll tear into them with all the rightful criticism they deserve. You put me in a room with voters, before the election, I will sing their praises. I’ll advocate their victories and downplay their flaws.

          Not because the victories are substantial, and certainly not because their flaws aren’t terrible. But there are two tents big enough to win the office, and the other one is worse and backed by lockstep support.

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              A little, but they lost many many votes by shutting out any pro-Palestinian voices from the DNC. They wouldn’t even let Palestinian-Americans endorse Harris at the convention, let alone talk about Palestinians suffering (but they stacked the convention with Israeli-Americans and families of hostages).

              • actually@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe the convention lost them more voters than gained ? Widely circulated videos of democrat delegates making fun of the protest that was naming the dead kids might have lost Michigan all by itself .

                • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Absolutely. This should not have been difficult; “we grieve the loss of these children and something needs to be done to force both sides into a ceasefire” was too controversial for the mega donors of Biden/Harris. Any talk at all of nudging the rightwing Israeli government was too unpalatable even though Chuck Schumer himself was publicly criticizing Netanyahu.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Liz Cheney represents conservatives who don’t want to vote for Trump. That demographic represents more votes than leftists. That’s what happens when you play hard to get too hard, the person you’re after gives up and goes after someone else.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Just because it wasn’t successful doesn’t mean it wasn’t the rational choice. It’s very possible that she would have done worse if she hadn’t courted conservatives, and possible she would have done even worse than that if she’d gone full tilt toward progressives. Hindsight is easy.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you think one genocide is just as bad as 3, when the difference is millions of lives, then you have no heart.

          Drag gets it, okay? “Just as bad” is a great soundbite. It gets people riled up and ready to take action. But it’s also false, because it erases millions of genocide victims. And drag wants to know whether you’ve thought about the millions of genocide victims you’re erasing to accomplish your goals. Has it not crossed your mind yet, or did you make a conscious choice to use genocide-denying rhetoric?

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Very false. They both represent capital yes, but one is objectively more opposed to leftist policy than the other. Republicans are more anti-Union, more against single payer healthcare, etc.

          Voting isn’t about choosing who best represents you, that person isn’t going to win. Voting is about choosing who you’re going to be fighting for the next 4 years. I’d rather push left against the Democrats than the Republicans.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re confusing social reforms with genuine Leftist movement. Both the Dems and the Reps are thoroughly anti-Leftist, and neither can be worked with along Leftist lines.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You specifically mentioned policies like “single payer healthcare,” not the establishment of Socialism. How do you get these policies without establishing Socialism? By trying to use the existing system and parties in it, however futile that may be. Hence why Leftists focus on establishing Socialism, and why the Dems and Reps are equally hostile to Leftists.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you can’t tell the difference between bad and worse, I can’t help you. They’re both hostile to the left, but only one is also hostile to the center.

                  I believe if leftists actually started showing up, and petitioned the Democrats for charge, they might get some meager nominal concessions. The Republicans not only won’t do that, they’ll double down on authoritarianism.

                  The very same tepid institutionalism that prevents them from boldly accomplishing anything is exactly what makes them a more favorable enemy. Republicans don’t care about the institutions at all, they’ll install a Christo-fascist ethnostate the exact moment they have the opportunity. I’d rather fight neoliberals than Christo-fascists, and I’m not sure why you wouldn’t.

                  But go ahead, don’t vote strategically to support an easier-to-defeat enemy. I’m sure playing on hard mode will establish socialism faster.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        you committed a genocide; you are a fascist. shut the fuck up ‘those guys are fascists’ you are literally the same

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t do shit. The unwavering support of Israel is the natural extension of the exact same foreign policy we’ve adopted since Israel was founded. And don’t pretend it’s magically gonna get better now that Dems lost. Talk to Palestinians, they’re terrified of Trump’s bromance with Bibi.

          Both parties are the enemy. Democrats are an easier to defeat enemy. Why would you want to fight the harder enemy? The odds are already stacked against the left, why make them worse?

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The odds are already stacked against the left, why make them worse?

            Because to performative “leftists”, the point isn’t to help people, the point is to suffer in conflict against a great foe. They want the greatest foe so they can suffer the most. In their ethical system, that’s virtue. And if that results in a few million Palestinians dying, that’s an acceptable cost of doing business.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t do shit. The Palestinian genocide is a built in feature of both parties. I support one of them.

            Talk to Palestinians, they’re terrified of Trump’s bromance with Bibi.

            Fuck you just making shit up to win an internet argument. Bloodless fucking ghoul.

            Democrats are an easier to defeat enemy.

            Based on what? How for 3 out of every 4 years it’s fucking forbidden to say a bad word about them and how they siphon off everyone who would otherwise have human morals from actual good work? How the fucking shit are you having the goddamned fucking gall to say this shit when the only fighting you want to do against them is telling people to vote for them?

            Well good news! They got beat, so now we can move on, right??

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Support” and “damage mitigation” are two very different things.

              Fuck you just making shit up to win an internet argument.

              I’ve been donating directly to Palestinians distributing aid for years. I talk to them, that’s what they say. But sure, you know better.

              the only fighting you want to do against them is telling people to vote for them?

              Who said anything about “only”? I’m talking about setting the floor and working from there. Look at the two options on election day, and vote for the better starting point.

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Don’t listen to the Palestinians who correctly observe that they’re being exterminated with a democrat in charge. Listen to the Palestinians I claim exist who support the democrats that are committing a genocide against them. The people of Palestine want Juan Guiado as their president.

                Who said anything about “only”? I’m talking about setting the floor and working from there. Look at the two options on election day, and vote for the better starting point.

                No one said shit. I’m watching what you actually do and what happened the last 4 years when you got what you wanted. It puts the lie to all the hollow bullshit you’ve repeated to death here.

                You distributed aid with one hand and you voted for their extermination with the other. I don’t give a fuck what you have to say or what percentage of it is not a lie. I’m sure you’re telling the truth about the last part. You’re a nazi.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Don’t listen to the Palestinians who correctly observe that they’re being exterminated with a democrat in charge.

                  I listen to both. Neither party will end this. One party will expand and accelerate it. Both things are true. That’s what they have been saying, that Biden’s policies, and by presumptive extension Kamala’s, were horrific, but Trump would be even worse. And you claim the voices saying that are a rhetorical fabrication. Erasing victims of genocide in an impossible situation pleading to mitigate the damage, because that conflicts with your Internet argument. Who is the bloodless ghoul?

                  I’m watching what you actually do and what happened the last 4 years when you got what you wanted.

                  You don’t know the first thing about what I actually do and what I want. I don’t want the Democrats. I just want MAGA even less, and no one else has 80 million votes.

                  You distributed aid with one hand and you voted for their extermination with the other.

                  I voted to keep out the greater evil, but sure. Pretend that if Biden lost and Trump was in office on Oct 8, Palestine would be better off. One thing is true, the genocide would have ended much sooner. Get out of your Internet bubble.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The person you’re replying to voted for less genocide. If you didn’t vote, then you voted no preference. You’re a genocidal fascist throwing stones from your glass house.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My favorite postmortem take so far has been “why don’t democrats get in line like republicans do??”

    It’s just such perfect mask-off liberalism, I just want to make a supercut of it for next election when libs are whining about why their unpopular candidate/policies aren’t winning.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It wouldnt matter if the democrats lost if 3rd parties had equal and fair access to the electoral process.

      Unfortunately, democrats prefer republican authoritarianism over having to actually compete for your vote.

      Party over country all the way until the dissolution of this stupid fucking nation state that enslaved us all.

      • MeowZedong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget how the Democrats supported free and fair elections by suing third parties all over the country to remove them from ballots and collaborated with Republicans to form private organizations that allowed them to legally bar third parties from participating in debates and gaining valuable time in the media.

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you think your political role is to uncritically support whoever is chosen for you by the Democratic party, you are simply throwing away your political power. Worse, you are indicating that their strategy of shaming you into compliance works and they never have to provide you with any political program that aligns with your positions.

    Instead of doing what the party tells you, think for yourself and work to build actual power for the people around you, not the capitalists picking your pocket.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I already see people running disclaimers in their comments that are critical of democrats. If only we weren’t handcuffed to these garbage people by First-past-the-post voting.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    this is so backwards. the republicans are acting like democrats not the other way around

    republicans -> MAGAcrats.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most people just see Fascism as Hitler and killing people. They don’t recognize subservience to and complete blind support of corporate/wealth interests as a flavor of Fascism. It’s why I’ve grown to appreciate the term “friendly fascist.”

        “Yeah I’ll support your LGBTQ+ cause if all it costs are nice cheap words, BUT DON’T YOU FUCKING DARE TOUCH MY CORPORATE MONEY MACHINE!

    • bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good. That’s when Democrats should be criticized the most, because that is the only time you have the power to exercise any leverage over them. Why would you refuse to criticize them when you actually have a tiny bit of leverage and wait until you have no power at all and your criticism is completely irrelevant and will be ignored? That is just someone who wants to complain but doesn’t actually want anything to change.

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty dumb question ask after this particular election. Let’s see, if you had stock in a company who only sold a product once every four years, should you complain about the company and its products during the sale? Hmmm. Hmmm.

        Only if you’re privileged enough that the failure of success of the sale won’t affect you. Yeah, we see you.

        • bunchberry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, crying about “privilege” while you’re here demanding that people shouldn’t speak out against a literal modern day holocaust at the only time when they have the political power to make some sort of difference. Yeah, it’s totally those people who are “privileged” and not your white pasty ass who doesn’t have to worry about their extended family being slaughtered.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Critiquing the dems while telling us how trump did some good things…

    Is this… Yes, its supporting trump.

    Otherwise, yeah, nail the dems to the wall.

    (Oops. Forgot this was .ml. Trump is good for reasons.)

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who said anything about Trump besides you?

      I swear, libs make up their own narrative to punch left regardless of what Leftists do.

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Geezuz. Nobody had to say it. I’m saying if people do that, then yes they are.

        People. Learn how to read. Understand.

        Do you only read the first sentence of a comment?

        The density is suffocating.