• Bureaucrat@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Literally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.

        If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?

        • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Does listening to them ulitmately get you to the correct answer more quickly on average than not? If so, why aren’t you talking to them?

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        “I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”