• Bureaucrat@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Literally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.

      If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?

      • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Does listening to them ulitmately get you to the correct answer more quickly on average than not? If so, why aren’t you talking to them?

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      “I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”