borschtisgarbo to Shit Reactionaries Say · 3 months ago[succdem?] Walz is totally gonna push the overton window leftNSFWimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up152arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up150arrow-down1image[succdem?] Walz is totally gonna push the overton window leftNSFWborschtisgarbo to Shit Reactionaries Say · 3 months agomessage-square27fedilinkfile-text
minus-square☭ 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗘𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ☭Alinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down1·edit-23 months ago Why is voting a moral choice? Why can’t it be a strategic pick so we have a choice over the opposition? voting is a strategic choice, but voting for one fascist instead of another is not a sound strategy
minus-square-6-6-6-linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 months ago“I dunno because of this thing happening in Gaz-” “SINGLE-ISSUE PURITY TESTER REEEEEE”
minus-squareheggs_bayer [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoBut drumpf would genocide them even harder. In an election between 100% Hitler and 500% Hitler, voting for the former is harm reduction. \s
![[succdem?] Walz is totally gonna push the overton window left](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/8be304b1-ce96-485f-b491-a80ac4bd3ebd.jpeg){kind=link}
voting is a strategic choice, but voting for one fascist instead of another is not a sound strategy
“I dunno because of this thing happening in Gaz-” “SINGLE-ISSUE PURITY TESTER REEEEEE”
But drumpf would genocide them even harder. In an election between 100% Hitler and 500% Hitler, voting for the former is harm reduction. \s