• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            In this specific case, it actually seems fine to me. Like the other poster said, what are they supposed to do, turn their dead son’s room into a home theater? I’m sure that won’t put a damper on movie night. /s

            As it is, it serves as a much more immersive version of a photograph. I don’t see the harm.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not, but if a sudden change in acceptability happens do to a continuous change in scale, I feel very comfortable asking why.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s an awkward situation for sure. I’m trying to imagine what could be done with the room if they cleaned it out. All I can think is that they could never convert it into a room that they would want to spend time in, and the only alternative seems to be storage which almost seems disrespectful to the memory.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah. I mostly just thought this was a sweet memorial. It doesn’t necessarily mean they’re in denial or anything, they just want to keep a piece of him there like most grieving people do.