This is the article I am talking about.
Every circumstantial evidence and common sense argument would suggest that the US was to gain the most from this attack. But deranged liberals of all ranks, from mainstream “journalists” to the rabid NATO defenders of lemmy.ml, tried to gaslight you into thinking that at best the jury was still out on who did it and at worst accused Russia for doing it even though they stood to lose the most because of the outcome.
Seymour Hersh is clearly just spewing Russian talking points here. No, I didn’t read the article, because it’s obviously written by a Kremlin agent and I don’t want to engage with Russian propaganda. I don’t even have to read it – it’s obvious that Seymour Hersh is a Putin puppet, because if he wasn’t, he wouldn’t have written this article. NATO is a defensive organization. Slobber o’ crayon