• kippinitreal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    In your guys opinion, is that good or bad? Privately funded would mean proprietary & profit driven implementation for such a crucial technology (if successful). I personally don’t like it.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      The CPC still maintains a lot of influence over companies even when they’re getting their funding from private industry as part of their “politics in command” strategy for controlling market forces. We’ll see how it plays out.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yep, if they need to disappear a CEO, no matter how big, they can and have done so in the past.

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          8 days ago

          i don’t know why you got a downvote, disappearinga CEO should be the most popular thing the ccp does

          • SUPAVILLAIN
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Not to an Amerikan cosplay-capitalist lmfao. (I call them cosplay-capitalists because not a one actually owns capital; they just lap at the scraps that fall on the low-quarters of the c-suites they worship.)

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Any path that takes us to unlimited clean energy is the right one IMO. We could always do a little espionage and make our own domestic fusion drive eventually.