• Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      With authors often paying for open access publications literally out of their very own money, not just grants.

      • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not at the time this happened. Aaron’s case was one of the motivating factors that led to the Open Access publication movement gaining enough traction that authors could publish that way. JSTOR access is paid for and administered on college campuses by libraries and librarians as a whole field felt terrible both about the paid publication system and the way Aaron was treated. As a community of professionals, the Librarian and Information Science community pushed very hard for the adoption of Open Access publishing into the Academic community.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Good to know we had something very good out of this.

          Now, let’s beat the living hell out of publishers so that those crazy open access publication prices would decimate.

          Because right now, I literally cannot afford publishing further than Q3, which already eats up most of my personal grant earnings (which are so bad I can say I work purely for an idea).

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    229
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Look, the kid was a hero, but this is also patently false.

    He was not sentenced to 35 years. The trial hadn’t started. 35 years was the maximum possible sentence. He was given a plea deal for 6 months that he rejected.

    We don’t need to spin lies to make his story more tragic than it already is.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      169
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      35 years max, plea for 1/2 that was rejected. He was going to get the book thrown at him to make an example. 5 years minimum but I wouldn’t doubt 10-20.

      The rapist traitor that headed a insurrection on Jan 6 2021 has never spent a day in jail and is still the frontrunner for president to be legally elected in 2024.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        still the frontrunner for president to be legally elected in 2024.

        The front runner? Really?

        I’m not being sarcastic. Im genuinely interested, but can’t be arsed to start going through polls because it’d mean going through the biases of the pollers.

        • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just remember polls gave Hillary almost a guaranteed win. For all intents and purposes, Trump is the front runner regardless of what any polling says

          • UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 months ago

            And the result were statistically within what they predicted. She did get the popular vote but lost in key states where the margins were small.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, they did not. That’s not what happened.

            Polling probably has taken a dive in accuracy since then, though. Uptake in cell phone use in younger generations has been lingering over the industry for a long time, and it’s finally caught up with them.

            • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

              72% chance from here. Probably high enough that swing state voters opted to stay home. This was the vibe practically all October. The FBI felt confident enough in her win to announce they were investigating her to appear unbiased.

              Polling being inaccurate for whatever reason doesn’t change the article after article assuring everyone Hillary had it in the bag.

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                72% chance means Trump needed to flip two coins and have them both come up heads. It’s not that ridiculous.

        • GluWu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          From the nearly all the polls I see, yes. But like you said, bias of pollers. I’ve seen a few that go more in depth to try and figure out the “responds to polls” bias, but I still only see biden ahead by a margin. With those small numbers of concentrated effort vs the wide reach general polls, trump is. It does not instill any level of confidence in me that the “general” polls don’t reflect the “general” voting bias. Even without all of this analysis, just a few million voting for trump is unbelievably concerning to not just the future of the US, but the world that this single country dominates. These fascists are campaigning on the cut your nose to spite your face philosophy.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      also he worked with wikileaks… i think he was named as a source posthumously…

      he also wrote an open source system of servers that function exactly like wikileaks submission system (actually i think it is, given clues as to how it operates… like the manning chat logs)
      dead drop is now called “open drop” and powers every major newspaper’s leak submission system…

      he was murdered.

      not only the did it make no sense, given the 6 month plea bargain option, but he was an outspoken activist and would’ve at least left a note… in the form of some post online…

  • Bruhh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I remember correctly, it wasn’t even illegal since these scientific articles should have been public to begin with because they used public funds.

  • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Shout out to Alexandra elbakyan. She continues part of aaron’s work by running sci-hub and libgen, but lives safely out of reach of the american criminal “justice” system 💔

  • Hubi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    2 months ago

    He didn’t even share them as far as I know, he just downloaded them. And the trial hadn’t started yet when he committed suicide.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He didn’t get the chance to share them because he was caught downloading them, and his download requests were getting blocked.

      And to be clear, he wasn’t downloading from the Internet as one might download a car, he went into a restricted networking closet and connected directly to the switch, leaving a computer sitting there sending access requests. He had to keep going back to it to check on the progress, which is when they caught him.

      And the trial hadn’t started yet when he committed suicide.

      Yeah, I agree with the sentiment of the post, but this is just wildly misleading. He was not sentenced to anything, he committed suicide before the trial.

      He was given a plea deal for 6 months that he rejected, in an effort to make the feds justify the ludicrous charges they were pressing. Had it gone to trial, he certainly wouldn’t have been found not guilty, but it’s unlikely many of those charges would have stuck. It’s extremely unlikely he would actually have served 35 years.

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Oil CEOs pay fines for bringing about a global climate catastrophe. Fascist politicians are given slaps on the wrist for an attempted coup d’etat. Government officials openly commit gross violations of privacy and suffer no consequences.

    But a guy hacks a university network and downloads a hoard of scientific articles that should have been freely accessible to begin with and he gets 35 years in prison. I’ll admit I wasn’t familiar with this case before I saw this picture. Which is kind of insane in and of itself.

    • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      Remember Kim Dotcom? He had a file sharing website and the police raided his house with guns like he was a dangerous criminal. There is a video of it on YouTube.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly I had forgotten about the whole MegaUpload stuff.

        Given, Kim Dotcom had a long history of being a trash person before the MegaUpload raid; Trading in stolen credit card info, embezzlement, black-hat hacking, etc… But he definitely didn’t deserve to get swatted just because he hosted a site that was popular with media pirates. The police used his prior convictions as justification for their heavy-handed tactics. But the reality is that they likely would have gone in with SWAT even if he had a squeaky clean record beforehand.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not exactly what happened.

    Aaron committed suicide before his case went to trial, and so he was never convicted let alone sentenced. 35 years was never even likely; had it gone to trial there’s every reason to think he’d have been acquitted outright, or at worst given a slap on the wrist. Not that he should have even been charged, of course.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also JSTOR never wanted him prosecuted only to have the files deleted and call it a wash. It was MIT that supported prosecution and who called the fuzz in the first place.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Law Enforcement and the Justice System have every responsibility to enforce laws as they were written, JSTOR pressed charges and the US Government offered Auron a plea deal to reduce his sentence to 6 months.

      Definitely an argument about the inadequacy of US Healthcare to be made here, though. Auron clearly could have used some counseling.

      • zik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 months ago

        I thought there was a prosecutor who pursued this beyond all reasonable bounds, making Aaron’s life a living hell and driving him to suicide?

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Well if a Psychologist had helped him through it maybe he could have turned around and sued that prosecutor into disbarment.

          EDIT: People are downvoting this, but TBH I wouldn’t kill myself over a 35 year sentence much less the 6 months in the plea deal this guy got. Wouldn’t consider it for a single moment. He had agency in his own actions.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              2 months ago

              Spilled milk, but yeah that dude was a shill and should probably be dealt with if they haven’t already.

              • jagungal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The prosecutor went on to have a pretty successful career and I think had a role in Obama’s administration. She basically said “I’m sorry your son killed himself” but never admitted to having a part in his death.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        and the US government was almost definitely trying to make an example out of him: literally anybody who read the case details whatsoever.

      • vfye@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Only prosecuting district attorneys can chose to bring a crimial charge to court.*

        *except in north carolina… for some reason they actually let victims prosecute.

    • Evrala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also likely that he was never intending to share them. One of the things he was looking to do is aquire a large dataset to analyze trends.

      In other words, he was charged for entirely legit use.

      • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I recon he was looking for a specific trend the us government really didn’t want him to prove they had been forcing.

  • fossphi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    I highly recommend watching the documentary on him, Internet’s own boy.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      He likely wouldn’t’ve stayed. We’d be better off with him anyways. He was moving towards activism and politics. He’d probably either be a prisoner or a congressman by now. And like honestly, we could use a congressman like him.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    He’s probably rolling in his grave at the enshittification of reddit now too

  • Legend@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They got the wrong reddit founder .

    (not that I wish that on spez even tho he is bad I don’t think he is that bad )