• Euphorazine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just remember polls gave Hillary almost a guaranteed win. For all intents and purposes, Trump is the front runner regardless of what any polling says

    • UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      And the result were statistically within what they predicted. She did get the popular vote but lost in key states where the margins were small.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, they did not. That’s not what happened.

      Polling probably has taken a dive in accuracy since then, though. Uptake in cell phone use in younger generations has been lingering over the industry for a long time, and it’s finally caught up with them.

      • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

        72% chance from here. Probably high enough that swing state voters opted to stay home. This was the vibe practically all October. The FBI felt confident enough in her win to announce they were investigating her to appear unbiased.

        Polling being inaccurate for whatever reason doesn’t change the article after article assuring everyone Hillary had it in the bag.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          72% chance means Trump needed to flip two coins and have them both come up heads. It’s not that ridiculous.