• Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pass. Qwant has had its share of controversies, regardless their results aren’t better than DDG.

    If Mozilla was serious about this they would run their own Searx instance and let people choose what engines they wanted to use.

    https://searx.space/

    • Aria
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      DDG is inherently bad because it’s hosted in the USA and has to comply with those laws and gag orders. Nothing I’ve heard about Qwant makes it seem like a worse option.

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        What I linked to is a listing of public Searx instances. You can look at the list and see things like uptime, where they are hosted, etc.

        For performance I find it much better than DDG. In the settings page you can choose which search engines you wish to use, for example Brave, Stract, and Qwant. You can also tailor results by adding things like Lemmy, F-Droid, and Anna’s Archive.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Wtf is Qwant?

    Edit: oh, OK, it’s a search engine. Next questions, what is the nature of the “partnership” and how is this better or different than DDG?

    • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sometimes better search results than DDG (but about the same), EU based (France), offers a Openstreetmap based alternative to google maps (opposed to ddg using Apple Maps) and a slightly worse privacy policy are the main differences

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      what is the nature of the “partnership”

      The partnership is entirely of monetary nature. Like all “partnerships” Mozilla has with 3rd parties that are integrated into Firefox.

      That is their business concept. Those companies pay high amounts of money, and Mozilla adds their links into the browser or sends them “anonymized” usage statistics for advertisement purposes.

      • akilou@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right, then the question is, what’s Qwant’s business model. Where do they get the money from to send to Mozilla? I’m just always so suspicious that the users are the ones getting burned

        • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          what’s Qwant’s business model.

          They sell search queries and meta data (IP address,user agent, etc.) to Microsoft for advertising purposes.

  • 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s no way Mozilla is replacing Google as the default, so what are they actually announcing here? I didn’t read any actual results thats happening. Are they just adding Qwant as an option in the search engine settings?

  • LemmyHead@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Too bad about the choice for qwant. I’ve been using them for many years and they have big flaws: they block visits from unsupported countries, so if you’re traveling, you’re fucked. They also started blocking ad blocking users and their main webpage is full of crap that you have to disable manually. Their support is non existing. And they use the same censorship as Microsoft. I moved to brave search recently

  • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    This part of the post suggests that Qwant will not become the default search engine, but given the millions that Mozilla gets from Google it should not surprise anyone.

    Did you know you could choose the search engine of your choice right from your Firefox URL bar?

  • governorkeagan@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Has anyone here used Qwant? I’ve seen it mentioned a handful of times but I’ve not tried it myself.

    • Adda@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      I had used it for a while in the past. The results were surprisingly good. I have moved to other search engines to experiment since then, but I have nothing bad to say about my time with Qwant.

        • Adda@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Brave Search currently, but I am still in the experimenting and search engine-hopping phase. Henceforth, Brave Search is not my final search engine, either.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Interesting. Which other ones have you tried? I’d be interesting in hearing what you thought of all of them!

              • dan@upvote.au
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I was trying Kagi but I’m put off it now that they’re partnering with Brendan Eich. I don’t think I’d use Brave search, for the same reason.

    • RickyWars1@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve used it a long time now. I find it to have much more relevant results than DDG did last time I tried.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This means Google isn’t paying the millions to be the default anymore??

    Seems to be an awful news then, that money was useful for development and a default is trivial to change

    • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I didn’t see a line that suggests they’re putting Qwant as default, only that they’re making it available as a search provider, just as DuckDuckGo and others are.

      They say:

      Did you know you could choose the search engine of your choice right from your Firefox URL bar?

  • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Doesn’t Mozilla rely on Google for default search? Does this change that relationship?

    • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Doesn’t Mozilla rely on Google for default search?

      and money…mainly the money.

      Does this change that relationship?

      Unknown at this time.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The fact that Mozilla is so dependent on Google is the actual problem here, diversifying where they get funding from is precisely what they should be doing going forward.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I definitely agree with you, but finding another partner to get hundreds of millions of dollars per year isn’t trivial.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sure, but finding more partners is crucial for long term survival, so if Mozilla never reaches out to anybody for fear of offending Google then they’re always gonna be stuck in this sort of abusive relationship. Becoming so reliant on Google in the first place shouldn’t have happened, but it’s better to start fixing that sooner than later. It’s also worth noting that the main reason Google funds FF is to protect themselves from antitrust litigation. As long as FF is around and gets a bit of usage, then Google can point to it to say that Chrome isn’t a browser monopoly.

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It started appearing in my search engines list after every update and I remove it from the list every time.