• Slatlun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Where they stand on other comments? To put it in the most aggresive light- you were called out for inaccurate information. Even so, you must’ve recognized the original post was factually incorrect because you changed the post title. Why not just own it. It goes like this, ‘Oops, copied the title with the photo. I fixed it.’ No big deal. Of course, making a mistake, quietly trying to fix it, then pretending the person pointing it out is in the wrong is another way to go.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I updated the title since I couldn’t find collaborating information. I can’t verify it. However, that doesn’t change the fact that OP has a very clear agenda.

      • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You posted something you didn’t verify then attacked/dismissed the person who pointed it out because of your bias coming in. Does that mean that they don’t also have an agenda? No. Does it help me to trust anything you post? Also no.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sure, we all have our biases. I’ve had lots of negative interactions with the person in question, and I don’t take anything they say to be in good faith. It is what it is.

      • Sh3Rm4n@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        And you have a problem with them because of their agenda that they are calling out that you are posting stuff without any source / proof?